Launch of APPG on British Muslims Report
on Islamophobia Defined at Parliament
Dr Mozammel Haque
Let
me clear first the two words on the title – Islamophobia and APPG on British
Muslims. The history and background of Islamophobia goes back, of course in recent
times, when the word was coined and first used in the Runnymede Trust Report 20
years ago defined Islamophobia as anti-Muslim racism. Since that time
Islamophobia has passed a ‘dinner table test’ said by Baroness Warsi. The
recent report also shows the rise of 52% hate crimes against the Muslim
community.
The
second word APPG on British Muslims is a young organisation which was founded
only a year ago did some useful works to promote many aspects of Muslims in
Britain and Muslim contributions in British society and Britain as a whole.
This APPG on British Muslims launched its report last December 2017 entitled ‘Marry
Muslim Christmas’. The APPG felt a clear need for a definition of Islamophobia
and they came out with a definition of Islamophobia.
According
to the APPG on British Muslims, “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type
of racism that targets expression of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.”
The
APPG report recommend the adoption of the abovementioned definition which was
reached after following widespread consultation with academics, lawyers, local
and nationally elected officials, Muslim
organisations, activists, campaigners, and local Muslim communities.
Foreword
of the APPG Report
on
Islamophobia Defined
In
the Foreword of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on British
Muslims, Anna Soubry, Conservative MP and Wes Streeting, Labour MP, the
co-chairs of the APPG on British Muslims, said, “The year 2017 marked the
twentieth anniversary of the seminal report of the Runnymede Trust’s Commission
on British Muslims and Islamophobia, ‘Islamophobia: A Challenge for us all’. The
occasion of the anniversary, and the follow up report by the Runnymede Trust
last year, highlight the extent to which Islamophobia remains a palpable concern
among British Muslims when it comes to inequality and discrimination. Across
policy domains, from employment, education and criminal justice to housing,
healthcare and hate crime, Islamophobia has a significant negative impact on
the life chances and quality of life enjoyed by British Muslims.”
The Foreword
also maintained, “Our impetus for conducting an inquiry into a working
definition of Islamophobia/anti-Muslim hatred derived from the twin
observations of seeing equality rise up the political agenda but Islamophobia
remain conspicuously absent or demonstrably relegated as a subject of interest.
Twenty years on from the promulgation of the term Islamophobia, we can no
longer ignore or deny its impact on our British Muslim communities.”
“Let
us be clear, Islamophobia is rooted in racism and its victims are not just
Muslims but also those who are perceived to be Muslims. Its effects are seen in
individual behaviours and institutional processes. Whether it is Muslim women
who are denied job opportunities because they wear a headscarf, gurdwaras that
are defaced because they are mistakenly identified as mosques, or Muslim
students who fail to secure entry offers from Russell Group universities, the
effects of Islamophobia are real and measurable,” the Foreword mentioned.
APPG
Report in its Foreword also said, “In pursuing this inquiry to
arrive a working definition, we have
attempted to engage the ‘process of defining’ through widespread consultation
with parliamentarians, experts, lawyers, community activists and victim-led
organisations so that we could confidently propose a working definition which
serves to give meaning to the word and nature of the thing we call
Islamophobia.”
Launch of the APPG Report on
Islamophobia Defined
On
behalf of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on British Muslims, Labour
MP, Wes Streeting, co-chair of the APPG on British Muslims launched the report
on Islamophobia Defined at the British Parliament on Tuesday, the 27th
of November, 2018. Followings are the proceedings of the launch of the Report
on Islamophobia Defined.
Wes Streeting Labour MP
While
giving an introduction and background to the report, Labour MP Wes Streeting,
the Co-chair of the APPG on British Muslims, said, “I am proud to co-chair the
APPG on British Muslims with my Conservative colleague Anna Soubry actually
conceived from the cross-party consultations from both the House of Commons and
the House of Lords. This is an issue of enormous importance. This can be seen from
the turn up in this windy afternoon. This is also an enormous topic of concern
and interest to Muslim community across the country and the people who care
about tackling prejudice and discrimination in all of its forms.”
“APPG
on British Muslims is a relatively young APPG. We are now going for a year. We
sorted two things really; one is to promote so many aspects of Muslims in
British and the Muslim contributions in a making in our country as a whole.
Around this time last year our first report Marry Muslim Christmas which
highlighted the amazing works of the Muslim community’s social organisations
are doing, particularly doing at the festive times of the year,” parliamentarian
Wes said.
He
also mentioned in his opening introduction, “We have to immediately turn to
Islamophobia the real problem and the negative aspects of life in Britain.
There are plenty of evidence research already out there about the hate crime
attacks on Muslims, verbal attacks, the physical attacks on people who are
non-Muslims perceived to be Muslims; the attacks on Muslim institutions whether
mosque or community centres. So we knew this is the problem that happens to be
tackled.”
“Whenever
any of us talk about Islamophobia in the Parliament immediately we see
reactions of denouncing dismissals legitimisation of Muslim people,” mentioned
Wes.
He
said, “So we set out defined what islamophobia was. We started Islamophobia was
an anti-Muslim hatred. We decided the best job we could do is to put together
all of that existing research already out there and my goodness there is a rich
body of research out there already. We engaged with a huge number of academic
enormously generous their time and expertise in this area.”
Wes
also informed how the APPG worked with Muslim community organisations, public
sector bodies, public service providers and cross section of Muslim communities.
He said, “We also engaged with Muslim community organisations nationally and locally;
we engaged with public sector bodies; public service providers and most
importantly far-reaching cross section of Muslim communities; PGGI Muslim
communities across the country to go and test some of our thinking and assumptions
with people. Because the best way to a kind of reaching to an authoritative
definition we ask people themselves of their own lifetime experiences; what
they wanted to see in the Report in term of definition of Islamophobia.”
Parliamentarian
Wes also mentioned the findings are very conclusive. He said, “I think the findings
you will see from the report presentation today are very conclusive. There was
a very clear need for a definition of Islamophobia and you will see the use by the
Muslims community across the country if Islamophobia, that’s the term, the most
widely used. It’s a problem, its shortcoming. We found when we were asking people
what the term you would most likely to see you use one of the vast majority of
people set forward.”
Definition
of Islamophobia
Wes
also maintained, “So we adopted in our report and in defining Islamophobia I
think we sought to do two things; one is to establish beyond any doubt and I
quote now from the definition, ‘Islamophobia is rooted in racism and it is a
type of racism the targets the expression Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.
And I think that’s really important firstly to make clear beyond anyone doubt what
we have seen in terms of Muslim experience of Islamophobia is racialization of
Muslims as a group and expression of Muslimness not just attacks on people but
attacks also on buildings and there is no doubt in some of the evidences we
looked at experiences we heard from academics and quantitative research or Muslim
community themselves what people are experiences is a form of racism. That is abundantly
clear definition we had from the Sikh representative organisations. They
described their experiences of Islamophobia.”
“We
are very clear of protecting people from prejudice; protecting people from
discrimination; try to improve the quality of life and the opportunities for Muslim communities life
across the country. We hope with this report, this is just the start of the
process because in order to tackle racism and prejudices of any kind; he must
be able firstly properly to define and understand and most importantly we got
to accept the principle that is the victims of discrimination ought to be able
to define their experiences about prejudices for themselves. How that experience
properly understood by legislature, by policy makers, by employers, or by people
of any position of power and authority. And I hope that definition will help
people to do that,” mentioned Labour MP Wes.
“The
second thing we want to achieve today is not just to get your support of the
definition or to sign up up for what will be a big campaign.,” the co-chair of
the APPG on British Muslims, Wes, said and added, “I actually want this to be a
court of action for far too long real acts of violence and discrimination
against Muslims have gone unchallenged unchecked and sometimes un-prioritise by
people in position of power. Too often people working this building have abused
their authority and their position using languages about Muslim people,
particularly Muslim women that will never be accepted against any other group
in our society. That has to be stopped too.”
Co-chair
of the APPG on British Muslims Wes also informed that they met Home Secretary,
Shadow Home Secretary and chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee. He said,
“So this document defines Islamophobia as a court of action to tackle Islamophobia.
We want to see the government adopts this; we met Home Secretary this afternoon,
Shadow Home Secretary, chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee. So we want
to see the government adopt this; we also want everyone whatever their position
or authority really take this what can I do to tackle prejudice against Muslims.”
“There
might be an HR director going back and look at practice; Are we sure we got it right; people applying
for jobs here, Muslims have a fair
practice at the opening; are we sure people progression in their pay is it fair
or are we may be inadvertently discriminating against Muslim people. We want
people walking down the busy street like Oxford Street when they see women like
my constituent, were attacking on broad daylight during rush hour and in a
state of distress,” said parliamentarian Wes and added, “Each of us can live a
decent and meaningful life. That’s, for this report, is all about.”
Chair, Home Affairs Select Committee
Yvette Cooper, MP
After
thanking the chair and members of the APPG on British Muslims, Yvette Cooper,
MP, the chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said, “To give you my commitment
that the Home Affairs Select Committee is keen to take this forward. We have shortly
will be completing our enquiry into hate crime and publishing; we would be tackling
the toxic hate crime and levels of racially motivated, religiously motivated
and other kinds of hate crime across the country But we are also conducting a
parallel inquiry into Islamophobia which was started by suggestions are sharp
now with Naz (Shah) is also on the Committee and part of the work already done
take evidence around Islamophobia in the media. We are taken evidence of Sayeeda
(Warsi) and also look at Islamophobia online and the escalation online hatred;
we know the impact that can happen offline as well. And we think throughout the
work even this initial work by actually how charging it was with the lack of
widely accepted definition of Islamophobia.”
“That’s
why I think this work is so important by the APPG; this is not just about a
word but actually we know the word is incredibly powerful and therefore round
the definition what then helps you to be able to take actions; to be able to
challenge prejudice, to be able to challenge discrimination; to be able to
challenge the kind of hatred and to be able to challenge to kind of divisive
society but also with you too often to silence British Muslims,” said chair of
Home Affairs Select Committee and added, “We know that the Muslim women face
the experience of worst hate crime and the worst divisive prejudice as well. So
very best of luck with the rest of the events this afternoon and with the
commitment that I know you people will be making how we take this forward and we
look forward to be able to take evidence from all of those involved in this
piece of work and also to be able to do our bit to take it forward and to
challenge the appalling prejudice and divisiveness across the country.”
Omar Khan – CEO Runnymede Trust
While
welcoming the APPG Report on Islamophobia and its definition, The Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) of Runnymede Trust said, “For taking so seriously, for
engaging not just academics but by British Muslims and the wider community, I
am really proud of what you have done and finally I do welcome this report and
its definition and I think it follows from Runnymede definition established in
our 20th anniversary report which is to define Islamophobia as anti-Muslim
racism. We think it is really important to focus on racism, not just as a question
of analysis of definitions, but as mentioned my previous speaker has suggested ensuring
that our civil society and policy response tackle all the ways which British Muslims
are disadvantaged and discriminated against.”
Omar
Khan mentioned, “There is a challenge here which is not to deny that hate crime
is indeed a terrible experience for many years to many British Muslims around
the country but at the same time we need recognise that hate crime is the only
way in which British Muslims are disadvantaged and discriminated. We hold the
secretariat of the APPG on racial community a few years ago; we did inquiry into
black and Muslim women in the labour market and we had multiple people coming forward
talking about changing their names; taking off their headscarves in order to sit
in an interview and we know we have to send many CVs of Asian and African sounding
surnames that means the Muslim sounding surname just to get an interview. The
same people could not enter the door because of the surname; do your sons will
go to treat you fairly once you go through the door or things like progression
promotion and pay rise. “
“I think we need to recognise this definition
does that the discrimination of British Muslims experience is just one off the
street a member of the EDL as Sayeeda Warsi is called ‘dinner table Islamophobia,’”
said Omar Khan and added, “The final thing I say as the Director of an
organisation not only 20 or 21 years ago first published a Report on
Islamophobia but racism on its all forms. The other event of defining which is
again a challenge we need to navigate Islamophobia and racism; it connects to
other form of discrimination and racism; it allows us to understand that all
forms of discrimination are at the same time they have the distinctive property.”
CEO
of Runnymede Trust, Omar Khan, said, “So yes Islamophobia does look different
from anti-Semitism which looks different from anti-black racism or Afro-phobia.
But all of them are forms of racism and are not only that useful analytical point;
it is a useful point for policy makers to think about all the different
communities that experience racism and indeed all of us are fighting it. If you
are opposed to one form of racism you should be opposed all forms.”
He
also said, “One last word I do think the free speech point Wes (Streeting) has mentioned
easily is a challenging one. The way we put in our Report criticism of ideas is
a hallmark of free society but discriminating against people is a sign of an unjust
one and I think that’s the distinction we have to keep in mind and Muslims do
need to accept that there would be criticism, sometimes tough criticism of Islam
but I think people who make those criticism also need to anticipate that some
of those critics wade into attacks on Muslim themselves as people. So we need
to keep distinction clear but at the same time many people criticise Israel are
not motivated by anti-Semitism; so many of those who do criticise Israel
actually are not anti-Semitism. Similarly most of those who criticise Islam,
may be, are motivated by Islamophobia, but too many of those who do are actions
motivated by denying the rights and equal opportunities of British Muslims where
this report needs to move forward too. And I welcome today and I look forward
to working with the group together too.”
Ed Davey, MP
Liberal Democrat Home Affairs spokesperson
Thanking
the APPG, Ed Davey MP, the Liberal Democrat Home Affairs spokesperson said, “I
think this is the incredibly important piece of work; important because it is
absolutely needed because of the single sense I think the way the APPG has got
about it thoughtful evidence based way bought this subject does.”
He
also mentioned an incident of mosque attack and said, “When the mosque was
attacked by English far right, everyone came behind the community cohesion with
depth and emotion.”
Supporting
the work of the APPG, Liberal Democrat Home Affairs spokesperson said, “For a
moment in the history of our country where we need to re-establish commitment
by everybody in our community making sure that the politics is welcoming
particularly welcome to everyone in our community.”
“You
certainly have my personal support right for this cross-party report. I have
read some of your proceedings,” supporting the report Liberal Democrat Home
Affairs spokesperson said, “Less be clear this is the foundation.”
“There
is an existing sense of division; now we have got to heal that; we have got to
use many ways of healing it; be clear of
Islamophobia,” said Ed Davey MP.
Speaking
about Islamophobia and Media, Liberal Democrats Home Affairs spokesperson,
Davey, MP, mentioned, “I see Islamophobia everywhere in the front pages of a
number of our newspapers.”
Naz
Shah, MP
Describing
this day the historic day, a part of history day, Labour Parliamentarian Naz
Shah said, “As a Member of Parliament with a large Muslim constituents like the
MP in Parliament, you know to have this
kind of piece of words that we have here is for me very historical. And what we
are sharing with is historical today and I think we need to really as much has
everybody has said what this definition means; you are playing a part in
history, from 20 years ago since from that coined Islamophobia to that day Islamophobia
has passed a dinner table test; this is version three where I sit; Islamophobia
defined.”
Labour
MP Naz Shah also mentioned, “My message to those critic is this; this is
something that the community defined. I went out there talk to that community;
I am representing that community and I am still the member who represents that community.
We go out and work wherever it is, Ilford, Sheffield, that being Birmingham
wherever we being wishes come from the community. Those who are quick to judge this
definition today they really need to check a hard look at themselves and who is
it that they represent because certainly it is not the constituency I
represent; the Muslims that spoke to whoever behaviour that abuse that we
talked about today.”
Parliamentarian
Naz Shah also mentioned, “For me; this subject is so close to me; because I
want my daughter if she decides to wear the hijab to be able to wear that
hijab. I want my son if he wants to grow a beard when he is older to be able to
grow a beard.”
Referring
to the gathering that turn up in a windy afternoon to attend and participate on
the launching of the Report, Labour MP Naz Shah said, “You are part of our
journey and this journey is for every Muslim of UK and beyond.”
Rt. Hon. Dianne Abbot MP
Shadow Home Secretary
Rt.
Hon. Dianne Abbot, MP, Shadow Home Secretary said, “I did want to come and show
my support to the important work the APPG is doing. I do not want to say this;
I have literally spent political lifetime fighting Racism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia
all this through. It was necessarily fashionable to fight though; but I think
you could almost argue that Islamophobia is the most intense form of racism we
see today and Baroness Warsi have talked about a kind of dinner party Islamophobia
where people almost casually can exchange Islamophobic remarks on dinner;
people who would not make other types of racism remarks. Think of a day of type
of liberalism they can be hostile to our Muslim community
Referring
to Brexit and rise of hate speech, Shadow Home Secretary Dianne Abbot
mentioned, “So in a difficult time with Brexit as a rise in hate speech and
hate activity; it has never been more important to support minority community
and particularly our Muslim community.”
Dianne
Abbot, Labour MP said, “I believe the APPG is doing very important work I think
the work on a definition that is important.”
Shadow
Home Secretary Dianne Abbot mentioned, “Actually we are strongest society all
together when we fight racism Islamophobia anti-Semitism. We are stronger;
stronger society; stronger community and stronger nation. We all know; I
certainly know what the Muslim community has contributed; what the Muslim
community continues to contribute in this country and it is so important both
in foreign policy and domestic policy to fight Islamophobia in whatever party
it raises its heads because exactly it is freighting and it makes us all much
weaker.”
Lord Bourne (Minister for Faith)
Thanking
Baroness Warsi and Anna Soubry for all the works that have been done on this Report,
Lord Bourne, Minister for Faith, said, “It is almost thoroughly researched
report I have not chance to go through all of it but it is very persuasive good
stuff there and we should cover very basic points, first of all, any hate crime,
any discrimination against any body in our country is hate crime against all of
us; discrimination against all of us that runs through the report and I think
that is an important thing.”
His
second point is in relation to Islamophobia. Lord Bourne mentioned about the
hate crime figures rise. He said, “52% rise in hate crimes often against people
who have been identified as Muslims. It is not just Sikhs and Hindus; sometimes
the Sikhs have frozen the whole thing that’s why we need to tackle it.”
Appreciating
and praising the fantastic work done by (Akeela) Ahmad and her organisation
anti-Muslim Hatred Working Group, Lord Bourne said, “She I know and other
members of that group are very keen to do work based on what you have done
using should look at the definition. The government just as we have heard Sajid
Javid very much signed up to my boss very keen to do so. We want to do it; we
want to do it properly but it is something that we need to do.”
Lord
Bourne concluded by saying, “We are very keen to take it forward but just once
again you know I think we are all united on this; we need to be united but
thank you very much for being there; thank you very much for the work that you
have done.”
Baroness Sayeeda Warsi
While
delivering her closing remarks, Baroness Sayeeda Warsi paid tribute to Lord
Nicolas Bourne, this Minister for Faith is phenomenal. She said, “I praise
people like the way he engages with all the things across the country; the time
he takes out to go see them; the time he takes out to understand; the brave way
to conduct the conversation; the sincerity with the open minded issues; is
really phenomenal. Also the long long way you continue in that room with many
bigger roles that I can look forward to working with you.”
Referring
to the report on Islamophobia defined, Baroness Warsi mentioned, “This work has
been hard; it has been tough; it has been tough to ask the questions that we needed
to ask; we all started out with very different positions; I published a book a
year and half ago in which I said the term I preferred anti-Muslim prejudice,
anti-Muslim sentiment, so here I was as part of an inquiry mentally in a different
place where many of my other colleagues were and what we felt was really
important.”
“We
wanted to follow the evidence and the only way we could do that by making sure
that we heard from the academic as broadest as possible; engaged them as deeply
as possible and analysis that we work with people we are being working at the
top of this work as well as the grass-roots communities is that we buy and
challenge communities themselves; and some of that were tough;” said Baroness
Warsi and added, “but the challenge we had was to make sure that we talked to
as many Muslims as possible.”
“What
we felt this is a parliamentary group
that had to be led by the evidence of academic work that we heard, said
Baroness Warsi and mentioned, “When we finished, one thing what we had learnt last
twelve months, that the debacle within the Labour Party and the adoption the
definition of anti-Semitism; it is this. It’s not a great look when you start
telling communities by the fact that they are facing the onslaught this should
not be the way they wanted that we know what they are feeling.”
Baroness
Warsi said, “I sincerely hope that we can learn the lesson within the
Conservative Party of what Labour went through; and not say thanks for the definition we will
have our own version thank you.”
While
concluding her closing remarks, Baroness Warsi said, “I want to say two things really
in conclusion. There is one thing that is fundamentally important to me when we
started writing this report that was about making it very clear that this
report was and should not be about sitting down
debate; especially sitting down debate on practicals which have sadly in
the media.”
Baroness
Warsi also mentioned, “This is not about Islam; it is about people; actually it
is not about Muslim, it is people who are either showing of expression of Muslimness
or perceived Muslimness. People powerful testimonies were from visibly Muslim
women I should likely to face Islamophobia. Sikhs, the people who are perceived
to be Muslims; and converts, families of converts, white people who marry Muslim
a non-convert were seen as traitors to Britain; so many of these people who are
even Muslim were facing this discrimination; were facing Islamophobia on the
basis of racialising a community and that’s why Anna (Soubry) actually has
insisted on having the word despite supervision by our academic that this is rooted
in racism; not just a formal racism; it
was rooted in racism and target expressions.”
Besides
the above Members of the Parliament, there were other MPs, such as Afzal Khan
MP, Elanor Smith MP, Tan Dhesi MP spoke during the Launch of the report. Chair
of Government’s Anti-Muslim Hatred Working Group, Akeela Ahmed, MBE, also
spoke.
After
that there was a Questions & Answers (Q & A) session, when support came
for the APPG Report on Islamophobia Defined and comments made from the floor.
No comments:
Post a Comment