Thursday, 20 December 2018

Jesus: The Prophet of Islam Peace be upon him

Jesus: The Prophet of Islam
Peace be upon him (PBUH)


Dr. Mozammel Haque

Christmas was celebrated in the month of December throughout the whole world. The Christmas was passed a few weeks ago. Christmas was celebrated in the United Kingdom, like any other places. I think, this is the occasion we have to know each other, to know our co-workers, colleagues and neighbours. Jesus was the Prophet of Islam (peace be upon him). His name was mentioned 25 times in the Qur’an and a whole chapter, Surah al-Maryam was devoted to the mother of Jesus, peace be upon him.

The believers in the Oneness of God who belong to the tradition of Abraham: Muslims, Christians and Jews are one community. The first foundation of belief held by all monotheistic believers is that there is but one God. No dissenting voice: all Muslims, Christians and Jews worship one and the same God. The second central belief is a common lineage of Prophets, sent by God with revealed message of Truth. God sent a guide, a messenger or a prophet who taught the same message, the need to believe in the Oneness of God. In the case of Jesus, he was undoubtedly a true prophet.

Islam is a religion of peace, understanding and tolerance. It has five pillars - the first pillar is Imaan. To belief in the Oneness of Allah, all the Prophets sent by Allah, all the Books revealed by Him, belief in Paradise and Hell and Life after Death is part of Imaan. So Muslims throughout the world believe in all the prophets sent by Allah, the Most High. Jesus, the son of Mary, is one of them.

The Virgin Mary and her son Jesus, May peace be upon them both, are mentioned often in the Qurán. In fact, there is a chapter of the Qurán named after her called Maryam. Jesus, referred to in the Qurán as Isa ibn Maryam - Jesus the Son of Mary- is one of the greatest of the prophets of God whom Muslims hold in very deep love and respect. The Qurán gives a greater number of honourable titles to Jesus than to any other figure of the past. The Qurán said: "And We sent, following in their footsteps, Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming that which came before him in the Torah, and We gave him the Gospel, in which was guidance and light and confirming that which preceded it of the Torah as guidance and instruction for the righteous.” (Al-Qurán 5:46)

Maryam, the mother of Jesus
Peace be upon him
Before I talked about Jesus, the Prophet of Islam, peace be upon him, I would like to quote from verses 42 to 48 of Surah Al-‘Imran from the Qur’an in English translation of those verses)as follows:

“And when the angels said, ‘Maryam, Allah has chosen you and purified you. He has chosen you over all other women. Maryam, obey your Lord and prostrate and bow with those who bow.’ This is news from the Unseen which We reveal to you. You were not with them when they cast their reeds to see which of them would be the guardian of Maryam.You were not with them when they quarrelled.

“When the angels said, ‘Maryam, your Lord gives you good news of a Word from Him. His name is the Messiah, ‘Isa, son of Maryam, of highest esteem in the dunya and the akhirah, [that is, in this world and in the next world] and one of those brought near. He will speak to people in the cradle, and also when fully grown and will be one of the salihun,’ [that is, of the people who are in the right place at the right time]

“she said, ‘My Lord! How can I have a son when no man has ever touched me?’ He said, ‘It will be so.’ Allah creates whatever He wills. When He decides on something, He just says to it, ‘Be!’ and it is. He will teach him the Book and Wisdom, and the Torah [the revelation given to Moses] and the Injil [the revelation given to Jesus], as a Messenger to the tribe of Israel …[Surah Al ‘Imran: 3. 42-48]

These two examples of the angels addressing Maryam give us a glimpse of two different periods in her life: one when she was a young girl; and one when she was about to become the mother of Jesus, peace be on them.”

Hannah, who was the mother of Mary was actually married to a man called Imran. Imran was descended from the Prophet Sulayman (Soloman), who was descended from the Prophet Dawud (David), who was descended from Judah, one of the sons of Yaqub (Jacob) – another of whose names was Israel – who was descended from Ishaq (Isaac), the son of the Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham).”

Birth of Jesus in The Qur’an
Now, I would concentrate, first, on the birth of Jesus, peace be upon him, in the light of the Qurán. In Sura 3, the Chapter Imran gives the longest version of the annunciation and birth of Jesus. It is said in the Qurán, "When the angels said, "O Mary, indeed Allah has chosen you and purified you and chosen you above the women of the worlds. O Mary, be devoutly obedient to your Lord and prostrate and bow with those who bow (in prayer).'” That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, (O Muhammad). And you were not with them when they cast their pens as to which of them should be responsible for Mary. Nor were you with them when they disputed. And when the angels said, "O Mary, indeed Allah gives you good tidings of a word from Him, whose name will be the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary - distinguished in this world and the Hereafter and among those brought near (to Allah). He will speak to the people in the cradle and in maturity and will be of the righteous.” She said, "My Lord, how will I have a child when no man has touched me?” (The angel) said, "Such is Allah; He creates what He wills. When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, ‘Be,' and it is.” (Al-Qurán 3:42-47)

Surah Maryam then proceeds with an account of the nativity or birth of Jesus. "So she conceived him, and she withdrew with him to a remote place. And she pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm tree. She said, "Oh, I wish I had died before this and was in oblivion, forgotten. But he called her from below her, "Do not grieve; your Lord has provided beneath you a stream. And shake toward you the trunk of the palm tree, it will drop upon you ripe, fresh dates. So eat and drink and be contented. And if you see from among humanity anyone, say, "Indeed, I have vowed to the Most Merciful abstention, so I will not speak today to (any) man.” (Al-Qurán 19: 22-26). The Qurán then narrates, "Then she (Maryam) brought him to her people, carrying him. They said, "O Mary, you have certainly done a thing unprecedented. O sister of Aaron, your father was not a man of evil, nor was your mother unchaste.” (Al-Qurán 19:27-28)

The Qurán said, "So, Mary pointed to him (Jesus). They said, ‘How can we speak to one who is in the cradle as a child?'”(Jesus) said, "Indeed, I am the servant of Allah. He has given me the Scripture and made me a prophet. And He has made me blessed wherever I am and has enjoined upon me prayer and Zakah as long as I remain alive.” (Al-Qurán, 19:29-31).

In fact, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said that Jesus was one of one hundred and twenty-four thousand prophets, between whom there is no cause for conflict or argument. Allah tells His messenger in one passage of the Qurán: "Say: We have believed in Allah and in what was revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and the Descendants (Al-Asbat), and in what was given to Moses and Jesus and to the prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and we are Muslims (submitting) to Him.” (Al-Qurán 3: 84).

Imam Bukhari, in his collection of the traditions, said that the Apostle of God said, "I am nearest of men to the Son of Mary. Between Jesus and me there has been no prophet.”

It is also said in the Qur'an: "And (mention) when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O Children of Israel, Indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad.” But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic.” (Al-Qur'an, 61:6)

The Qur'an clearly says: "O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His Word which He directed to Mary and a soul (created at a command) from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers.” ( Al-Qur'an, 4:171)

The Qurán also stated, "And (beware the day) when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, ‘Take me and my mother as deities besides Allah?'” He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen.” (Al-Qurán 5:116) It also said, "I said not to them except what You commanded me - to worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.” (Al-Qurán 5:171)

Crucifixion of Jesus
Peace be upon him
About the crucifixion of Jesus (pbuh), the Qurán clearly stated, "And (for) their saying, ‘Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the Son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah.' And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but (another) was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain. Rather, Allah raised him to Himself. And ever is Allah Exalted in Might and Wise.” (Al-Qurán, 4:157-158).

The unedited nature of the Noble Qurán gives Muslims confidence in their understanding of the nature of Jesus, which was as a servant of God, as Prophet.

First Published in December 2012


Wednesday, 19 December 2018

Trade with Companies in the Occupied Palestinian Territories

Trade with Companies based in
Occupied Palestinian Territories

Dr. Mozammel Haque

I was on the South East Gallery of the House of Lords on Monday, the 17th of December 2018 as guest of Lord Nazir Ahmed of Rotherham and listened to the two issues, one question was asked by Lord Ahmed on Rohingya refugees and another question was asked by Baroness Tonge on the businesses in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Followings are the question and reply on Trade with Companies based in Occupied Palestinian Territories at the House of Lords chamber on 17 December, 2018.

Trade with businesses based in Israeli settlements
In the Occupied Palestinian Territories
Baroness Tonge (Non-Afl) asked Her Majesty’s Government what guidance they provide to United Kingdom companies who wish to trade with companies based in Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

Baroness Manzoor (Conservative) replied, “My Lords, a company’s decision to trade with businesses based in Israeli settlements is primarily commercial. When considering activities in the region, the Government urge British businesses to consider the illegal nature of Israeli settlements under international law. We also encourage British businesses to take account of our Overseas Business Risk online guidance, which provides comprehensive information on the security and political risks of trading in the region.”


Settlements are illegal under international law,
present an obstacle to peace and threaten
the physical viability of two-state solution
Baroness Tonge (Non-Afl) asked again, “I thank the Minister for that reply and for talking about international law. Is she aware that I table Questions every week concerning the actions of the Israeli Government in Palestine, putting on record the relentless expansion of those settlements and the appalling behaviour of the settlers, including the demolition of Palestinian property, the destruction of their farmland, the denial of their fishing rights and the theft of their water? Does she realise that I have asked Questions about the imprisonment of Palestinian children and the maiming and killing of others? This is not to forget the blockade of Gaza, which the United Nations has said will be uninhabitable by 2020. Does she agree that these are all examples of Israel breaking international law, human rights law and the Fourth Geneva Convention? The Government have admitted this in the Answers that I receive, which I have here. When will our Government stop talking and writing Answers to Questions and take action to stop Israel’s illegal activities, as they do when other countries misbehave? Do we have to wait another 70 years?”

Baroness Manzoor (Conservative) replied, “My Lords, I am aware of the noble Baroness’s interest in this area and of the many Written Questions that she has laid down. To restate what has been outlined on numerous occasions, the UK’s position on the settlements is clear. They are illegal under international law, present an obstacle to peace and threaten the physical viability of the two-state solution. That is why we supported UN Security Council Resolution 2334, regularly raise our grave concerns on this issue with the Government of Israel and urge them to reverse their policy on settlement expansion.

It is up to British retailers who stock
settlement produce to adopt voluntarily
labelling policy recommended by Defra
Baroness Redfern (Conservative) joined in the debate and said, “My Lords, while consumers undoubtedly have the right to know the origin of the goods they buy, does the Minister agree that it sets a dangerous precedent to encourage consumers to determine their purchases on the ethnicity or nationality of the producer?”

Baroness Manzoor (Conservative) replied, “I thank my noble friend for that question. We understand the concerns of people who do not wish to purchase goods exported from Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. We also welcome the European Commission’s decision in November 2015 to issue indication of origin guidelines for products produced in the Israeli settlements. It is up to British retailers who stock settlement produce to voluntarily adopt the labelling policy recommended by Defra.”

BDS movement damages Palestinians
much more than it does Israel?
Lord Turnberg (Labour) joined in the debate and asked, “Is the Minister aware that some 50,000 Palestinians work for Israeli companies in the West Bank and that Israeli trade unions ensure that the Palestinians are paid at exactly the same rate as the Israelis for the same jobs and receive the same benefits? I can do no better than quote Nabil Basherat, a Palestinian who said: “The BDS movement has threatened my job security and livelihood … and damaged the livelihoods of hundreds … of factory workers”.

“Does the Minister agree that the BDS movement damages Palestinians much more than it does Israel?”

Baroness Manzoor (Conservative) replied, “My Lords, I agree that boycotts of any kind are damaging for both Palestinians and Israelis. The UK strongly opposes boycotts of Israel, which divide people and reduce understanding, but, as I said, that is why the UK, along with many businesses and institutions, operates a policy of differentiation in relation to Israeli borders. It is quite right that we take the stance that there are no boycotts in these areas because they damage the economy for both sides.”

Lord Pickles from the Conservative stood up and also Baroness Sheehan from the Liberal Democrats stood up and then

The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence (Earl Howe) from the Conservative said: “My Lords, it is the turn of the Liberal Democrats.”


Use of JCB bulldozers in the flattening
of Palestinian homes and schools?
Baroness Sheehan (Liberal Democrats) joined in the debate and asked, “Does the Minister agree that British companies must ensure that none of their products is used in the demolition of Palestinian homes and properties in the Occupied Territories? In her response, will she address in particular the use of JCB bulldozers in the flattening of Palestinian homes and schools?”

Baroness Manzoor (Conservative) replied, “I have already made known our stance on the boycotting of goods. The UK Government have had discussions with JCB on a range of subjects. Where a company decides to trade is ultimately a decision for each company to reach, taking account of the legal and regulatory environment as well as international human rights law. The British Government will continue to encourage and foster respect for human rights among UK businesses.”

Give people a chance to get out of
the hands of the men of blood
Lord Pickles (Conservative) joined in the debate and asked, “My Lords, surely the point made by the noble Lord opposite is pursuant: unemployment and poverty further extremism. Surely it makes sense to spread prosperity given that 10% of the working population in the West Bank is employed within these settlements. Given that the Oslo accords envisage land swaps, surely it makes sense for peace to spread prosperity and give people a chance to get out of the hands of the men of blood.”

Baroness Manzoor said, “I entirely agree with my noble friend.”

To ensure two communities working together
And we end up with a two-state solution?
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour) joined in the debate and asked, “My Lords, the opportunity is there. If you had listened to the radio this morning, you would have heard young Palestinians and Israelis desiring the same thing: the opportunity to prosper and use their skills. What are the Government doing to ensure we have two communities working together and that we end up with a two-state solution, in which both communities can prosper?”

Baroness Manzoor (Conservative) replied, “As the noble Lord is aware, the UK Government support a two-state solution. As I have said, the UK is a close friend of Israel and we enjoy excellent bilateral relationships. The British Government helped to establish the UK Israel Tech Hub, a non-profit organisation based in Tel Aviv and London, to help British companies looking for cutting-edge innovation and Israeli start-ups seeking to go through the UK. This kind of innovation is important to help individuals living in both Israel and Palestine, and to ensure we have good economic prosperity in the region.”


Tuesday, 18 December 2018

Lord Ahmed Asks Questions on Rohingya Refugees

Lord Ahmed of Rotherham Asks Questions
on Rohingya Refugees At the House of Lords

Dr. Mozammel Haque

I am fortunate enough on Monday, the 17th of December 2018 that I attend the Lords’ Chamber as guest of Lord Nazir Ahmed of Rotherham and listened to the two issues, one question was asked by Lord Ahmed on Rohingya refugees and another question was asked by Baroness Tonge on the businesses on the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Followings are the question and reply on Rohingya refugees at the House of Lords chamber on 17 December, 2018;

Situation of Rohingya Refugees
and their safe return
Lord Ahmed of Rotherham (Non-Afl) asked Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the situation of Rohingya refugees and the likelihood of their safe return to Burma.

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative Party) replied, “My Lords, conditions in the camps in Bangladesh have improved but remain difficult for the Rohingya community. The United Kingdom has provided £129 million of assistance since August 2017. We welcome Bangladesh’s continuing generosity in hosting the Rohingya community and its commitment to the principle of voluntariness on repatriations. I agree with the UN Refugee Agency’s assessment that conditions are not in place for safe and sustainable returns, and I assure the noble Lord that the UK will continue to press for independent monitoring by all UN agencies.”


Indictment of Burmese generals
and civilian leaders for genocide
Lord Ahmed (Non-Afl) : Lord Ahmed (Non-Afl) said, “My Lords, I thank the Minister for his reply. Will he join me in thanking the Department for International Development for providing support to the most oppressed people in the world? Is he aware that last Thursday the US House of Representatives passed a non-binding resolution, by 394 votes to one, identifying crimes against the Rohingya in Myanmar as genocide? Will Her Majesty’s Government support the indictment of the Burmese generals and civilian leaders responsible for this genocide in the International Criminal Court?”

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied, “My Lords, on the earlier point, I thank the noble Lord for his remarks. It is true that we can all be proud of the role that the Department for International Development has played over many years on behalf of those people who are suffering the worst crises, including humanitarian crises and the ethnic cleansing that we have seen of the Rohingya community in Burma. On the issue of Congress, I am aware of that vote—but, as the noble Lord will know, it is a long-standing position that we regard attributing genocide as an issue for judicial authorities. However, the United Kingdom is playing a key role in gathering evidence to ensure that the perpetrators of these crimes can be brought to justice.”

Resolution in the Security Council calling
for a global arms embargo on the Burmese Army
Lord Alton of Liverpool (CB) joined in this debate and said, “My Lords, 700,000 Rohingya have now fled to Bangladesh and there are reports of villages being burned and horrific human rights violations including the burning of homes, schools and mosques; the deliberate burning of people to death inside their homes; mass rape; torture; execution without trial; the blocking of aid; and similar offences being conducted against the Shan and the Kachin as well. So is the noble Lord, Lord Ahmed, not right to call for this, regardless of the vote in the American Congress, to be referred to the International Criminal Court? Why is the United Kingdom not laying a resolution before the Security Council calling for a global arms embargo on the Burmese Army, with targeted sanctions against Senior General Min Aung Hlaing and calling for Daw Suu, Aung San Suu Kyi, to speak out forcefully against these horrific offences?”

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied to the above questions, “My Lords, the noble Lord has raised various issues. First, he is quite right to point out that, as your Lordships’ House may be aware, there has not yet been a UN resolution. However, I assure him that we are speaking to all international partners, including those on the Security Council, to find a way forward on this. He will be aware that there are particular perspectives, most notably from the Chinese, which would, in our view, result in any ICC referral being blocked. We believe in the institution of the International Criminal Court and in its reforms, but any referral to it should carry full support. Looking at what has been debated and agreed in the Security Council over the last 12 months; thus far we have kept unanimity. That remains a primary objective, but I assure the noble Lord that we keep in mind the issue of all persecuted minorities—in Kachin and Shan provinces as well. We will ensure that evidence is collected and the perpetrators ultimately brought to justice in a local or international court.”

Two issues to be resolved – Citizenship and
referral to the International Criminal Court
Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrat) joined in this debate and said, “My Lords, there seems to be no prospect of the safe return of Rohingya refugees to Burma. This will remain so until we accept the full findings and recommendations of the United Nations fact-finding mission. Why are we so reluctant to do so? Does the Minister accept that two issues need to be resolved? The first and central issue is citizenship being denied to Rohingya refugees. Their citizenship is objected to by Aung San Suu Kyi, who should know better. The second is the attempt to secure referral to the International Criminal Court, which has so far stalled. Surely we cannot accept refugees being returned to Burma until those who have perpetrated such vile crimes against them are brought to justice.”

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied: “I totally agree with the noble Lord. On the issue of the fact-finding mission, he will know that we were one of the co-sponsors of that resolution in March 2017, and we agree with many of the mission’s findings. On the issue of safe return, I assure the noble Lord that there was talk of an agreement having been reached between Burma and Bangladesh in November this year for returns to start. However, we are very clear that they cannot start until certain conditions are met. First and foremost, they must be voluntary. The safety and security of the refugees is paramount. We have raised that, and I met with the Information Minister of Bangladesh on Thursday and again gained that very reassurance.”

Rohingya refugees be given
entry to the United Kingdom?
Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne (Conservative) joined in the debate and asked: “Does the Minister agree that, given the extreme unlikelihood of all the world’s 62 million refugees and IDPs being able to return home, once the United Kingdom has left the European Union we will be in a far better position to decide who to have here? I ask particularly that some of the Rohingya refugees, as well as some others globally, should be given entry into the United Kingdom once we are in in a better position to make our own decisions.”

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied: “My Lords, the history of the United Kingdom as a place which grants support to refugees from all over the world predates our membership of the European Union and will remain after Brexit. I pride myself on being in the Government of a country which over the years has stood up in support of refugees, internationally and in the UK. This continues today and will continue tomorrow.”

Safety and Security return of refugees?
The Lord Bishop of Winchester joined in the debate and asked: “My Lords, the diocese of Winchester has had a link with Burma/Myanmar since the late 19th century. This gateway state to Asia is therefore of great interest to the praying Christians of the diocese. Will the Minister confirm what action Her Majesty’s Government have taken to ensure the guaranteed security of existing internally displaced persons in Rakhine state and of any refugees who voluntarily return to Myanmar?”

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied: “The right reverend Prelate raises an important issue about ensuring the security and safety of those who are in Burma. We continue to raise this directly with the civilian and military authorities. He will be aware that one of the first visits that the Foreign Secretary made on his appointment was to Burma to raise the very concerns that the right reverend Prelate highlighted. On the safe return of refugees, I made it clear in answer to the previous question that the United Kingdom stands by the Rohingya community and supports their needs in Bangladesh. They should not return until we can guarantee their safety and security—and, above all, their return should be voluntary.”


Sunday, 16 December 2018

Seminar on Justice For Rohingya Minority At British Parliament

Seminar on Justice for Rohingya
Minority at Parliament

Dr. Mozammel Haque

A Seminar on Rohingya Minority of Myanmar was organised and held at the Houses of Parliament on Monday, 10th of December 2018. The title of the Seminar was ICC Jurisdiction over Crimes against Rohingya Muslims: What role for the UK Government and the International Community. The Seminar was hosted by Catherine West, MP for Hornsey & Green as well as the moderator of the Seminar.

The other speakers who spoke at the Seminar were Ben Emmerson QC, Founder Member of the Matrix Chambers; Judge of the Appeal Chambers of the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia; Rushanara Ali, MP for Bethnal Green and Bow; Co-chair, APPG on Democracy in Burma; Baroness Sheehan, Liberal Democrat International Development spokesperson and Sirazul Islam, 18-year old genocide survivor, born Wood in Kutupalong refugee camp in Bangladesh where he spent 8 years of his life before moving to the UK.

As the title of the Seminar was on International Criminal Court Jurisdiction over Crimes against Rohingya Muslims, the first speaker, Ben Emmerson QC first of all dealt with this subject and mentioned about the report of the fact–finding mission to the United Nations Human Rights which recorded the evidence conclusively the horrific accounts of murders, rapes, tortures, indiscriminate shelling committed by the Burmese Army on the Rohingya people. He also mentioned about the forced deportation of 650,000 people in one go. The prosecutors of the International Criminal Court has the jurisdiction to investigate the crimes of forced deportation implied the crimes committed by the army.

Ben also mentioned the role of the Rohingya themselves and the parliamentarians in this jurisdictions led by Rushanara Ali. Ben said, “That  Rushanara Ali wrote in September getting 180 parliamentarian signatures urging Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt to support full ICC investigation is an absolutely critical step in that process.”

Ben also mentioned, “It is to make ensure that the victims and the witness community have representation that they need organisation like JRFM is absolutely vital.”

Ben’s last thought on this is the future of the Diaspora. He said, I am sure all of these is a cynical cause of immediate repatriation to Rakhine state with no adequate security and no real basis for assuming same type of atrocities could not be happening again.”

But on the humanitarian dimension parliamentarian Rushanara mentioned her practical experience about the situation. She said, “I have seen people living in conditions worse; women and children were dying needlessly; humanitarian agencies having very limited rights to be in the camps particularly when it comes to medical support.”

“So the situation in Rakhine must not be neglected,” said Rushanara, MP, and added, “So we do need to continue to ensure our government applies pressure; we have been arguing this here in Parliament for years to provide better access for humanitarian aid. We need to make sure the funding for humanitarian assistance continues NGOs that are allowed to if you think about it it seems forced persecution.”


Rushanara said, “The biggest challenge for the one million people who live there is the fact that the aid, the humanitarian assistance is too short term. The UN appeal is not fully funded. Very important that you carry on applying pressure on the UK government and if you got network in another countries where they are contributed to national assistance then that needs to be stepped up. Because Britain on its own cannot meet the one billion pounds finance for the refugees who are in Coxes bazaar.”

The second thing which Rushanara mentioned is about the protection of rights of refugees. She said, “On humanitarian assistance the importance of  protection of rights for those who are living there; the rights of children, protection from trafficking which is of concern; women’s rights and psychological support - there are huge needs; that needs need to be addressed. That cannot be addressed without support from international NGOs.”

Baroness Sheehan said, “The world conscience says persecution, ethnic cleansing and atrocity crime; since the perpetrators committed crimes against own people are unacceptable.”

“This is a man-made crisis it is utterly preventable and we need to speak out; there should be a mechanism whereby the world conscience can be mobilised. We have a moral duty to act to alleviate the sufferings in Myanmar and we need to find international leaver to end these atrocities and we have the case of referral to the ICC recommended by the Human Rights Council that would be referred to the UN Security Council and Security Council would refer to ICC,” said Baroness Sheehan and added, “That China has that veto; basis of atrocities on this massive scale. I think that’s the question may be that we need to ask ourselves. We are a member of P5.”

She said, “I care deeply about the women and girls who have been the victims of sexual violence. We know that sexual violence is used as weapon in the conflict, in the persecution. And I am very pleased also that Dfd is being making huge efforts to trying collect evidence and documents some of the testimonies of victims.”

“But the UK is still trading with Myanmar. We can continue to trying pushing pressure on the government politically,” said Baroness Sheehan and added, “It is very crucial to people holding them into account. We should continue to create an independent evidence gathering mechanism let it to be IIIM that is the international impartial and independent mechanism.”

Proceedings of the Seminar
Emmerson QC
Ben Emmersons QC, Judge of the Appeal Chambers of the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, at the beginning referring to the organiser, JFRM, said, “ This is absolutely crucial period for those who are seeking accountability for genocide in Rakhine state and I use the word genocide consciously and I will come back to that word. I say that because those who are familiar of the background September is a pretty significant turning point in the campaign for accountability at the JRFM being pursuing.”

Ben mentioned the role of the Rohingya themselves and the parliamentarians in this jurisdictions led by Rushanara Ali. “It would not be just the Rohingya themselves and parliamentarians in this jurisdiction led by Rushanara Ali. Ben mentioned, “That  Rushanara Ali wrote in September getting 180 parliamentarian signatures urging Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt to support full ICC investigation is an absolutely critical step in that process.”

“Therefore under the politics behind criminal investigation of this kind Myanmar has already mounted a very serious political campaign try to prevent that from that happening. So that the first thing,” Ben said.

The second thing which is very important is the representation of the victims and the witness community in the process. Ben said, “The second thing is very important which is to ensure that the victims and the witness community those who have suffered the abuses are properly represented in these processes not purely political processes but abused for this peaceful process political process but what is absolutely vital is that the prosecutor gets as much as assistance can be given to her in order to able to marshal the evidence that will enable her to evaluate which of the allegations consensibly and probably prosecuted.”

Ben mentioned, “It is to make ensure that the victims and the witness community have representation that they need organisation like JRFM is absolutely vital.”


“It is very important that the victim and the witness community has organisation and has representation and there will be in the process representation in the criminal investigation and prosecution,” Ben mentioned and said, “I know that the campaign and the others campaign has the potential to be spearheading at all leadership as organisation amongst this community and ought to attract a mass support as possible so that they can consolidate their work.”

Ben also mentioned other legal avenues which need to be explored about sanctions against individual officials of the Burmese military authority. He said, “The other important legal avenues need to be to explore considerate and ultimately some of these proceed are first of all at each against individual officials of the Burmese military authority certainly and particularly civilians as well of the magnanity sanctions.”

Ben maintained, “Now it seems to be EU to enact legislation to identify individuals and sanctions on individuals human rights violated.”

Ben also mentioned, “Lastly it is important not to overlook the human rights violations from the community living in Bangladesh; in other words, as a result of the policies of the government of Bangladesh; there is a wide range of activities need to be being organised as quickly as possible. If this community is going to achieve justice in terms of accountability and reparation and that requires those political support as today’s events so important but also the financial support and extremely important I think to get the message out through your network of this organisation JRFM is being serious about being pursuing accountability and certainly as far as the United Kingdom is concerned is the organisation most effectively able to galvanise the actions that takes place.”

Ben’s last thought on this is the future of the Diaspora. He said, My last thought in this is not for me the question to address for those much more closely often the Diaspora;  as indeed the community in the refugee camps is the question of future safety of those; it is harrowing and chilly. I am sure all of these is a cynical cause of immediate repatriation to Rakhine state with no adequate security and no real basis for assuming same type of atrocities could not be happening again.”

Actually Ben’s concern was the security of the Rohingyas in the Rakhine state. He said, “Some thoughts in the end the answer to be are the security of the Rohingyas in the Rakhine state is a proper analysis and the proper implementation of their rights to self-determination. That does not necessarily mean independent statehood but it must certainly mean the right to be responsible for their own security that is a project that needs to be undertaken as quickly as possible.”  

Rushenara Ali MP
Rushanara Ali, Member of Parliament from the Bethnal Green and Bow constituency, have been involved in camp rights of Rohingya for years. “Despite many of us working in this field for many years the situation has continued to get worse and you heard the powerful testimony from Sirazul Islam and many of you would be familiar with and of course as well as the Rohingya population persecution and of other minorities as well,” said Parliamentarian Rushanara.

Parliamentarian Rushanara wanted to focus on two areas; humanitarian dimension and justice dimension. She wanted on focus on humanitarian dimension within Malaysia and Coxes Bazaar and justice dimension. She said, “I am really grateful to very renowned legal expert for being involved supporting the campaigns, this campaign as well as what we are doing in parliament. Although there are more Labour MPs behind the work we are doing in the Parliament. I want to thank the Justice for Minority Rohingya for all the work you are doing and the fund-raising terms in supporting the work here.”

But on the humanitarian dimension parliamentarian Rushanara mentioned her practical experience about the situation. She said, “I visited Rakhine state in 2013 and also in 2017 before the September attacks. What we need to focus on is both what is happening with those who were forced into camps in Rakhine state thousands people who are living in equivalent prison camps. I am sure others have been a better idea if they were in Rakhine. I have seen people living in conditions worse; women and children were dying needlessly; humanitarian agencies having very limited rights to be in the camps particularly when it comes to medical support.”

“So the situation in Rakhine must not be neglected alongside the rightful focus that we provide in Coxes bazaar number of people who have been forced there,” said Rushanara, MP, and added, “So we do need to continue to ensure our government applies pressure; we have been arguing this here in Parliament for years to provide better access for humanitarian aid. We need to make sure the funding for humanitarian assistance continues NGOs that are allowed to if you think about it it seems forced persecution.”


Speaking about the Bangladesh side, parliamentarian Rushanara said, “I was there across at the end of July and the thing already being mentioned I am not going to go over but the key points to remember is that on the humanitarian side the funding is short-term; the context is that this is Bangladesh which is one of the poorest countries in the world – there are million refugees; and the international community needs to think on the Bangladesh side there is a real need for them to make sure that there is proper access and that agencies are not caught up in bureaucracy that means next month to get permission that certainly the kind of representation  I got. Once got permission then there is a very short amount of time to deliver programmes.”

Speaking about domestic NGOs, parliamentarian Rushanara said, “The focus on working with domestic NGOs is generally quite positive because it means that some, I think, about 30,000 people are engaged in working who are from that country, working in the camps; as a result they have been able to counter some of the hostilities that kick in when refugees live in and give in in obviously there has been a presence.” Recent numbers in terms of Rohingya refugees who are in Coxes’ bazaar are bigger and the pressure on the wider host communities is growing, said Rushanara.

Speaking again on the domestic nationals, She said, one of the things I just wanted to highlight is some of the positives around over there are huge negatives are I recognised that. She mentioned, “I have seen there are domestic nationals who are working in the camps in collaboration with organisation like BRAC which is one of the biggest in the country on the largest scale in the world, in fact, working hand-in-hand within international NGOs with staff from that country. It does mean that they are able to act as a force of defence against hostilities and misperceptions they can kick in.”

Parliamentarian Rushanara then mentioned about the biggest challenge is funding. She said, “The biggest challenge for the one million people who live there is the fact that the aid, the humanitarian assistance, is too short term. You would be familiar with some of the underline reasons why that happened but the appeal is not fully funded. The UN appeal is not fully funded. Very important that you carry on applying pressure on the UK government and if you got network in another countries where they are contributed to national assistance then that needs to be stepped up. Because Britain on its own cannot meet the one billion pounds finance for the refugees who are in Coxes bazaar.”

The second thing which Rushanara mentioned is about the protection of rights of refugees. She said, “On humanitarian assistance the importance of  protection of rights for those who are living there; the rights of children, protection from trafficking which is of concern; women’s rights and psychological support - there are huge needs; that needs need to be addressed. That cannot be addressed without support from international NGOs.”


“International NGOs can bring specialists and also it cannot be addressed without the resources. It is one thing you can do to apply pressure both on our government on the humanitarian side and as well as other governments that is critical because it is going to be a double catastrophe – vulnerable in those camps,” mentioned Rushanara and added, “We are lucky with the monsoon season did not being as severe as it could have been but 15,000 people had been just before I got there it could have been worse and it could be worse going into here.”

Speaking about justice dimension, Rushanara mentioned about immediate forced repatriation. She said, “Ben has already referred to campaign we have been doing here in parliament and I am grateful to my colleagues, your MPs perhaps who signed the letter over 180 MPs previously they joined me in doing the same.”

She said “It is really important as Ben has said; really important; you keep the pressure on.  Brexit is dominating everything understandably but you need to make sure that you keep the pressure on MP.”

Addressing to the organiser, Parliamentarian Rushanara said, “Please carry on doing the amazing work because without that we would not get to this point. We know the pressure and the debate in parliament we had have some effects in making the Burmese military take note of what is happening here. We also know that our government is now, because we are the pen-holder authority in the UN Security Council, our government knows and the new Foreign Secretary knows   Britain has got to lead the way.”

Rushanara also mentioned, “If we don’t take action whether it is through the deportation group that Ben mentioned which is one track but it should not be the only track we cannot leave it to Bangladesh to bring the Burmese to the International Court. I know it is coming from the judges but it cannot be left to the developing country; they are the neighbour to Burma; to deal with the justice mentioned and bringing the Burmese military to. We have to be there to hold the Burmese military as well as the civilian-led government. The action would be taken against the generals; of course Aung Sang Sui ji is also responsible.”

Parliamentarian Rushanara also mentioned, “The Foreign Secretary has written back to us and he has one of the issues around the referral. Our government is working with France to build support in the UN Security Council among the members in order to make the case and also to ensure that it is not something that get it and I think you will all appreciate that it is important that we build that’s support that’s what we asked for. British government should be building support at the UN; that’s where we are at the moment. Again it is very important that if you have the opportunity to meet the Foreign Secretary or have links into the foreign office please use them to keep the issue on the agenda.”

Baroness Sheehan
Baroness Sheehan mentioned, “Two things came to my mind firstly the fact that Justice For Rohingya Minority (JFRM) is doing something and they are doing the most important thing which is making sure that we have the evidence in future so that we can hold people to account. End of the day one day the perpetrators of horrific crimes against humanity will be brought to justice.”

Speaking about World Conscience, Baroness Sheehan said, “What is world conscience? Universal idea that is international society we have preconceived notion what is right or wrong religion in this plane. The world conscience says persecution, ethnic cleansing and atrocity crime; since the perpetrators committed crimes against own people are unacceptable.”

“Perpetrating government should face consequences and this is a man-made crisis it is utterly preventable and we need to speak out; there should be a mechanism whereby the world conscience can be mobilised. We have a moral duty to act to alleviate the sufferings in Myanmar and we need to find international leaver to end these atrocities and we have the case of referral to the ICC recommended by the Human Rights Council that would be referred to the UN Security Council and Security Council would refer to ICC,” said Baroness Sheehan and added, “That China has that veto; that is the basis of atrocities on this massive scale. I think that’s the question, may be, that we need to ask ourselves. We are a member of P5.”

Baroness Sheehan mentioned, “Now UK has a significant bilateral relationship with Myanmar. In fact, it is the International Development Committee’s report on Myanmar, its findings that truly forced the government and the DfD to announce now that it is going to reshape aid programmes in Burma and no longer now provide financial aid to the Burmese Army within Burma to the few areas it allows to concentrate most refugees.”

Baroness Sheehan also said, “Britain does have some powers to try and get Myanmar to change its mind; prepare to use that power or not. It is good it is concentrating bringing food, medicines, the clean water to the refugee camps and really that something.”

She said, “I care deeply about the women and girls who have been the victims of sexual violence. We know that sexual violence is used as weapon in the conflict, in the persecution. And I am very pleased also that Dfd is being making huge efforts to trying collect evidence and documents some of the testimonies of victims.”

“But the UK is still trading with Myanmar. We can continue to trying pushing pressure on the government politically,” said Baroness Sheehan and added, “It is very crucial to people holding them into account. We should continue to create an independent evidence gathering mechanism let it to be IIIM that is the international impartial and independent mechanism.”

Baroness Sheehan also mentioned about the great role Amnesty International is doing a significant role of collection evidence. She mentioned, “Amnesty International’s great working campaign gathering imagery catalogue; it got photographic evidence before and after coupe operation by the Burmese military. They have shown the Rohingyas homes were particularly while the neighbouring non-Rohingya homes have been left intact and, in fact, that kind of evidence that is going to.”

Baroness Sheehan also mentioned about some actions taken by EU against the Myanmar. She said, “EU has been in some of the actions that has been taken against the Myanmar and the EU has strengthened its arms embargo quality cooperation with the European Council framework allowing for targetive restrictive measures against certain members of the tat madal runs 13 of August

She also mentioned, “UK has currently seven individuals from the tat madal security police and with the Machenski amendment we now have the legal mechanism.”

We do have the issue when amnesty acting collectively dates in the region; also Indonesia and elsewhere they have been very instrumental hosting refugees; they could do so much more I think push for greater action

Baroness Sheehan really wanted to say about repatriation. She said, “At the end of the day what the Rohingya they were forced to leave; forced repatriation without safety and safeguards is just unacceptable. Without safety and security of citizenship, they are just people and they would not be able to hold their government accountable.”




  

Sunday, 9 December 2018

Al-Furqan Foundation Celebrates 30th Anniversary of its establishment

Celebrating 30 Years of Al-Furqan
Islamic Heritage Foundation

Dr. Mozammel Haque

Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation celebrated 30 years of its establishment with a public lecture on Illustration of History in Islamic Manuscripts by Professor Charles Melville and an exhibition on Manuscripts and the Decorative Arts in London on 29th of November 2018.

I had the opportunity to accompany Dr. Ahmad al-Dubayan, Director General of the London Central Mosque Trust & Islamic Cultural Centre, to attend the celebration of the 30 years of Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation which was held at its premises in London on 29th of November, 2018.

To celebrate the 30th anniversary of the establishment of Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation, founded in 1988, the Foundation was exhibiting a selection of sources from the special collections held at Al-Furqan Library on “Manuscripts and Decorative arts.” The exhibition was divided into two sections:

1. The book display area
2. The panel display area.

About the Founder and the Foundation
The Managing Director of the Foundation, Mr. Sali Shahsivari, in his Welcoming Words, first talked about the founder, his upbringing, dream and fulfilment of his dream into reality in the form of the foundation of the Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage.

The Managing Director of the Al-Furqan Foundation, Mr. Sali Shahsivari,  first of all gave an introduction about the founder of the Foundation, Dr. Zaki Yamani. He said, when Zaki Yamani was surrounded by scholars in his early stages of life, he developed an appetite for knowledge as well as to protect and preserve the Islamic heritage by building a foundation. 

Sheikh Ahmed Zaki Yamani was born in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, on 30th June 1930. He is a lawyer by profession, with Master's degrees from New York University School of Law and Harvard Law School, whilst also having a doctorate from the University of Exeter. Before that, he studied at the University of Cairo and graduated with a Bachelor’s degree in Law in 1951.

He was Saudi Arabia's Minister of Oil (Petroleum) and Mineral Resources from 1962 until 1986, first Secretary General of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), and is regarded as the architect of a number of the Kingdom’s modern laws and regulations. In 1990, he founded the Centre for Global Energy Studies (CGES), an energy market analysis group in London.

The Saudi government sent him to New York University's Comparative Law Institute for non-American lawyers at NYU Law School and in 1955 he received a Master's degree in Comparative Jurisprudence. Sheikh Yamani spent the next year at Harvard Law School earning his second Master's degree in 1956 and then returned to the Ministry of Finance, joining the new Department of Zakat and Income Tax. The same year Sheikh Yamani founded the first law firm in Jeddah, bearing his name. One of his activities in his early professional career was to write articles in Saudi papers. These arose interest in various circles.

The Foundation and its activities
In 1988 Sheikh Yamani established The Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation through The Yamani Cultural and Charitable Foundation, which endeavours to preserve and publish historically important Islamic works.

The foundation’s Managing Director, Mr. Sali Shahsivari,  then talked about the Foundation and its activities. He mentioned, in brief, the activities and achievements of the Foundation. He said, thirty years after the Foundation, Al-Furqan Thirty years after foundation – Al-Furqan Foundation is a leading publishing Islamic heritage in many fields manuscripts – Makkah Magasids.

Let me give you some ideas about the aims, objectives and activities about the Foundation. AI-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation aims to participate in the preservation of the Islamic written heritage and make it more accessible both to scholars and to the interested general public. Part of the work of the Foundation is publishing the outcome of the research carried out in its three centres, which fall into different categories.

According to its brochures, The Manuscript Centre aims to document and preserve the Islamic written heritage through surveying, imaging, cataloguing, editing and publishing Islamic manuscripts, which constitute a significant part of the Islamic heritage. The Manuscript Centre's publications fall into the following categories: World Survey, Catalogues of Islamic Manuscripts of private and national collections, Edited Text, Studies, Conferences, Symposia, Lectures and Courses.

Three Centres of the Foundation
The Manuscript Centre organises conferences on various aspects and topics related to the Islamic written heritage. The Foundations selects and publishes the most relevant conference proceedings which include the precious contributions of the participant scholars and researchers.

The Maqasid Centre concentrates on the study of the philosophy of Islamic law and its objectives. It aims to broaden the horizons of knowledge for students of Islamic studies and encourages studies and research which contribute to the Islamic philosophy of law.

The aim of the Makkah and Madinah Centre is to support the research into the two holy cities of Makkah and Madinah, to publish articles, books and university dissertations dealing with them, and to publish a comprehensive Encyclopaedia specialised in the various fields related to them. Al-Furqan Foundation is taking charge of the publications of this centre which fall into the following categories: Encyclopaedia, Edited Texts, Studies and Lectures.
Featured Title

Introduction of the Lecture –
Illustration of History in Islamic Manuscripts
After speaking about the Founder and about the Foundation and its activities, the Director gave a brief introduction about the subject of the lecture and also about the speaker. First of talking about the topic Illustration of History in Islamic Manuscripts, he mentioned, “Little attention has been paid, even in work such as Haskell’s History and its Images (1993) on the way history was visualized at the time, how writers and artists in the past recorded their own contemporary or past history in texts and images. Even less attention has been paid to either of these aspects of ‘historical’ imagery in the scholarship on the Islamic world, despite some fine studies of individual historical manuscripts and their illustrations.”

This lecture   concentrated on the illustration of historical narrative in medieval manuscripts from different regions of the Islamic world – Iran, India, Central Asia and Turkey – and sought to compare their visualisation of both contemporary and ancient history. It also touched on to what extent these images provide modern historians with useful tools to interpret the past.
Speaking about the lecture and the lecturer, the Director of Al-Furqan mentioned about the Study of the Textual context; Qur’anic detailed drawings; secular-cultural manuscripts – decorative practice as well as artistic elements. He also said, “What influence of early Greek Romanic from this? Where did they derive their inspiration of history? “Tonight the lecturer – Professor Charles Melville will concentrate Islamic worlds – contemporary and Islamic history with useful tools – pictures is thousand worlds and Professor Melville illuminates us with his thoughts.”

About the speaker, Charles P. Melville is a British academic who has been Professor of Persian History at the University of Cambridge since 2008. He is the President of the British Institute of Persian Studies. He was one the editors of The Cambridge History of Iran (volume 7) and History of Literature of Iran

Professor Charles Melville lecture
Professor Charles Melville started his lecture first by asking three questions; first question why illustrates history? To make accessible to one of the key points; history involves; there are some choices; decision has to be made. There are Elements of choices by individuals; how closer that picture to the text; most of the pictures are interesting

Second question is; “Are the pictures can be taken as the real accumulation of what is happening. He said History has two sides; one is recording of the past and the other is the putting pictures; representing the past. One is illustrating the past – illustrating the present – what happened.

Professor Charles said the Final question – what uses for the historian in the context of Middle East; Are the pictures really authentic; another dimension; How is history understood by people; how they perceived it? Regardless of perceptual history.

Muslim world
Professor Charles started with Compendium of chronicles and showed Sheila Blair’s study of Rashid al-Dins - Jami al- Tawarikhs; scientific and ethical literature but no illustrative; no Arabic historical chronicles.

Then Professor Charles talked about the Iranic chronicles and Mughal chronicles and said about Persian translations and elaboration of Tabari’s chronicles – Iskandar succeeds Dara  Frear Bal’ami – illustrated 14th century. He also mentioned Persian audience in his book – depicting – Alkharid coronation. Also showed Mongols – showed a court scene: Diez album – Berlin. Mongols history documents - Paris

How the choices of picture has some documentary records – enormous escape of illuminating history.

Professor Charles also showed through the pictures Saljug Sultan Malikshah (c.1072-1092): enthroned ; Rashid al-Din (1307) and Hafiz –i-Abru (1425); Ahmed Tegulder receives an embassy Juvanini 1438) and Taimur receives wedding guests (Ali Yazdi, 1436); Enthronement of Timur (Zafarnama, 1480); Timur’s marriage to Dilshad Aga, (‘Ali Yazdi, Zafarnama, c.1486, Shiraz); Hulagu Khan enthroned 15 century, Jami al-Tawarikhs, 15th century; Conversion of Ghazan Khan (1295), Jami al-Tawarikhs, c.1425;  Dara and coronation of Chenggis Khan, Kuhistani Tarikhe Abul Khair Kbani 1540s and Jalal-ud-Din Khwarazmshah confronts Chenggis Khan across the Indus, Kuhistani Tarikhe Abul Khair Kbani 1540s.

Professor Charles also illustrated history through the images about Safavid illustration of Timurid History – Defeat of Toqtamish Khan 1391, Ali Yazdi, Zafarnama; Safavid illustration of early Islamic history Mirkhwand, Randat al-Safa 1469.

He then also mentioned through the images about Popular History of Shah Ismail (1501-1524) – Ismai’l proclaims Shi’ism, Reza Abbasi Museum, 1690; Ismai’l at Chaldiran, David collection; Ismai’l Battle at Chaldiran and fighting against Uzbeks, Reza Abbasi Museum Tehran; Fath ‘Ali Shah enthroned and fighting the Russians

Then Professor Charles through the images talked about the The Ottomans depict Ottomans History – Ottomans confront the Safavid before Chaldiran  (1514); showed Ahmed Feridun Nuzhar al-Akhbar (1568-69): Selim II receives the Safavid envoy at Edirne in 1567; Selim  at the Funeral of Suleiman (1566); Ottomans depict the lives of the Prophets – Murad III Noah’s Ark, Loqman, 1583; Princes of the House of Timur (detail)

After this Professor Charles illustrated through the pictures The Great Mughals and the History of Babur, 1526-30 : Humayun 1530-40, 1555-56; Akbar 1556-1615; Tarikhe Khandani Timur (Timurnama); Tarikhe Alfi, Akbarnama, Baburnama, Jami al-Tawarikh; Jahangir 1615-27;

Quick Facts about the Library at Al-Furqan
As this is about the 30th anniversary of the Al-Furqan Foundation, it is not out of place to mention about the Library at Al-Furqan.
*Al-Furqan Library is the only library in the world that holds more than 2,000 catalogues of Islamic manuscripts
* This is the only library in the UK that features the complete collection of the series edited by the renowned Turkish scholar Fuat Sezgin. Here, you can find all the series arranged together, following Sezgin’s encyclopaedic vision of knowledge production in Islam.
* This is the only library in the world that allows free and full access in house – to its collection of more than 150,000 manuscripts in digital copy, from Bosnia, Bulgaria, Egypt, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Germany, Syria, Turkey, and the United Kingdom.
* The reading room features a special collection dedicated to rare editions and translations of the Qur’an.
*The Digital Library has 121,450 cataloguing cards of manuscripts from 234 collections around the world. This number increases every day, as the Foundation dedicates daily efforts to the cataloguing of endangered and unknown Islamic manuscripts.
* The Digital Library has the facility to search manuscripts by filter categories such as: illuminations, illustrations, drawings and maps, together with many other filters for type of scripts or type of documentary notes available on manuscripts.
* Among the publications by Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation, there are 35 printed catalogues of Islamic manuscripts from different collections; as well as a monography that is fully dedicated to the study of the codicology of Islamic manuscripts. All publications are free to consult in the library.
* Specialized librarians are available to help students and scholars with their search of sources related to the Islamic manuscript heritage.