Thursday 21 February 2019

The Rawabi Holding Awards 2019

Saudi British Society Annual Dinner
The Rawabi Holding Awards 2019


Dr. Mozammel Haque

The Saudi British Society, which was formed in 1986 to help promote closer friendship and understanding between the people of Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom, has organised an Annual Dinner and the presentation of the Rawabi Holding UK Awards on Wednesday, 20 February 2019 at the Institute of Directors,, Pall Mall, London.

 The Rawabi Holding UK Awards are presented annually to one Saudi and one British citizen for their contributions to promoting Saudi-British relations and are generously donated by Mr. Abdulaziz Al-Turki. The winners are chosen from a list of candidates of high merit nominated by members of the Saudi-British Society. The recipients of these Awards of this year, 2019, are: Ms Hamida Alireza Trustee of al-Barakat Trust, UK and Mark Evans, explorer and educationist, currently the director of Outward Bound Oman.

Saudi-British Society
The Society was formed in 1986, as mentioned earlier, to help promote closer friendship and understanding between the people of Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom. The Society is a social, Cultural, non-political and non-commercial organisation. It aims to bring together British citizens who have an interest in Saudi Arabia (whether professional, commercial, cultural or otherwise) and Saudi Arabian citizens who are resident in, visitors to or interested in the UK. It aims also to provide a medium through which hospitability may be offered to Saudi Arabians visiting or living in the UK.

The Society’s Patrons are HRH The Prince of Wales KG and HRH Prince Turki Bin Faisal Al Saud. The Society has a President who is always the Saudi Arabian Ambassador in London and an elected Committee. His Excellency Saud Al-Hamdan, the Acting Ambassador of the embassy of Saudi Arabia in the United Kingdom and Ireland attended the event.


There are ordinary, corporate and student members. The Society is self-financing through subscriptions from members and donations.

Since 1986 the Society’s activities have included receptions for important visitors, dinners, exhibitions, lectures and book launches. Every year the Annual Dinner is combined with the presentation of the Rawabi Holding UK Awards.

Rawabi Holding UK Awards
The Rawabi Holding UK Awards are presented annually to one Saudi and one British citizen who made significant contributions to promoting Saudi-British relations. The Awards are presented by Mr. Abdulaziz Al-Turki, Rawabi Holding Group Chairman, who has generously donated them, to be granted on annual basis. The first award ceremony took place at the Travellers’ Club in London on the evening of the 23rd of January 2007.

Mr. Abdulaziz al Turki, a leading Saudi businessman from the Eastern Province generously awards two annual prizes, the Al Rawabi Holding Awards, to individuals who have made an outstanding contribution to furthering Saudi–British relations. The prizes are for £5000 each. The candidates (one of whom should be a Saudi citizen and one a British citizen, as from 2016) are chosen from a wide range of fields in which they have made a contribution, including education, literature, journalism, sport, women’s affairs, welfare and medicine, but not the field of commerce, as this is not within the remit of the Society. 


The candidates are nominated in the first instance by members of the Saudi-British Society and these names are considered by a Sub–Committee of the Saudi-British Society. A short-list is drawn up, from which 2 names are selected. These are then submitted to the main Committee for their consideration and the final selection put forward to Mr. Abdulaziz al Turki for his approval. The award–giving ceremony is held each year in late January, at a Reception, which is also the Society’s annual buffet supper, at which the Saudi Ambassador to London or his representative is present. 

Recipients of Rawabi Holding Awards of 2019
The Recipients of the Rawabi Holding Awards of 2019, are:
 Hamida Alireza, a Saudi citizen resident in Jeddah, is the founder and long time trustee of the Barakat Trust, a UK charity which supports the study of Islamic art and architecture and its history. Based for 30 years at Oxford University, and now in London, the Trust has funded well over 500 students and academics in their studies and research as well as supporting conferences, exhibitions, publications, digitisation and conservation.



In addition to enabling Saudi and other students from the Islamic world to benefit from the expertise in heritage available in British universities and museums, Ms Alireza has - both through her energetic leadership of the Trust and her personal engagement in organising exhibitions and field trips - helped to open eyes in Britain to the wealth and diversity of the art, crafts and architecture of the region including Saudi Arabia. She is also a founder of Mansoojat, the foundation which works to preserve traditional Arabian costume.  

Mark Evans MBE is an explorer and educationist, currently the director of Outward Bound Oman. After teaching in Saudi Arabia for several years, in 2004 he established Connecting Cultures, an association which takes young people from different countries on hiking expeditions in the Arabian desert or the Arctic and enables them to explore not just the wilderness but also their respective cultures, and to bridge the differences between them.

The Saudi British Society has supported participation in the trips by young people from Saudi Arabia and the UK, all of them very successful. UNESCO has been another supporter.

Mr Evans has also undertaken longer desert and sea expeditions in and around Arabia. In 2015/16 he crossed the Empty Quarter on foot and camel in the footsteps of Bertram Thomas (the first European to make the journey). His book, 'Crossing the Empty Quarter', was published late in 2016.

Abdulaziz Al-Turki
Mr. Abdulaziz Al-Turki is a prominent and seasoned businessman with solid experience in building successful businesses in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Region. He is the Chairman of the Rawabi Holding Group of Companies, a leading industrial player based in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia with over 3 decades of experience and a focus on oilfield services, contracting and industrial services and offshore services.


Mr. Al-Turki is the Chairman of Gulf Union Cooperative Insurance Company in Saudi Arabia and Gulf Union Holding Company in the Kingdom of Bahrain.

Aside from serving as Chairman of different companies, Mr. Al-Turki served as a board member of Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province Chamber of Commerce from 1990 to 1998 and the Eastern Province Council from 2000 to 2008. He was a member of the International Board of Advisors of the Lebanese American University (LAU), Beirut, Lebanon from 2002 to 2008 and a member of the University’s Board of Trustees from 2008 to 2013.

Mr. Al-Turki is considered a public figure recognised for his various philanthropic works. He is described as the leader of corporate social responsibility in Saudi Arabia. He is the Founder and Chairman of the Annual Charity Run Committee, the Saudi non-Communicable Disease Alliance, the Saudi Cancer Foundation, the Saudi Diabetes and Endocrine Association, the Saudi Foundation for Promoting Organ Donation and ARFA Multiple Sclerosis Society. Mr. Al-Turki is a founder and board member of the Charitable Society for the Care of Orphans Benaa) and a founder and board member of Husn AlJwar Organization in the Kingdom of Bahrain. He is the Honorary President of the European Asian Society for Surgical Oncology (EUASSO) and sits on the board of several other non-profit organizations and societies.






Monday 18 February 2019

Xinjiang: Horrendous Crimes Against Humanity - Rahima Mahmut

Horrendous Crimes Against Humanity taking
 place in East Turkestan – Rahima Mahmut

Dr. Mozammel Haque

“What we are reading in the papers is only the tip of the iceberg, as there are many more horrendous crimes against humanity taking place at this very moment in Xinjiang,” said Rahima Mahmut, London-based Uyghur Muslim who is a human rights activist, singer and translator, at the conference on China’s Brute Crackdown and Mass Incarceration of Uyghur Muslims held recently at London Muslim Centre, London.

Rahima Mahmut
“The gruesome details of how people were targeted and criminalized in the claim of cracking down on religious extremism, in fact, apply to all ordinary practicing Muslims,” said Rahima Mahmut, who was born in Ghulja, in the north of East Turkistan and brought up in a large religious family, came to the UK in 2000 to study and living here ever since, for the last 18 years. She is a London-based Uyghur Muslim who is a human rights activist, singer and translator. Her translation of The Land Drenched in Tears, by Soyungul Chanisheff won English Pen Translation Award. She mentioned, “We believe that there are possibly up to 3 million people are held in the camps.”

Rahima gave her personal insight to what is happening to the people held in detention and camps. She also described the hardships she faced and gone through. She mentioned, “For the last 18 years, I was unable to return to see my family and my beloved homeland because of my involvements in speaking out against the Human Rights violations imposed on my people by the Chinese government.  And my last contact with my brother was in January 2017 and he said: “Please leave us to God’s hand, we leave you to God’s hand too.” He indirectly told not to contact them anymore. Up till today, I don’t know how they are, if they are safe or interned in re-education camps. I have tried to find information indirectly, but it has not been possible. Whoever I approach is terrified to get involved as the political environment is so terrifying.” 


Rahima also mentioned that as she was working as an interpreter, she has been involved with various organizations in interviewing people who have been detained in re-education camps or prison. “Their accounts about the torture is chilling and horrendous,” said Rahima and added, “There was another detainee who spent nearly a year in three different detention centres, he described his ordeal for over 4 hours, he revealed that many innocent people he knew falsely admitted making bombs despite never having seen a bomb in their life in order to stop their torture. He described when he was taken to interrogation room, the sound of women and men screaming which made his legs feel like jelly. The horrific details which he described affected me so deeply that I was unable to sleep for two nights.”

Rahima also mentioned, “People who are outside of these establishment are not free of intimidation either, as they have no freedom of speech, language, dress, eat, drink, and religion. The entire way of Uyghur cultural heritage and tradition has been taken away from them, including their funeral rights.”

While describing the hardships she has gone through and the people who are suffering in the so-called re-education camps, Rahima also reported a report published by Bitter Winter. In that piece a vivid description of the present situation is depicted. It runs like as follows:
The whole of Xinjiang region gives the appearance of being on a war footing. But this is a war like no other. This is a “people’s war on terror,” where ordinary citizens have been dragooned into the task of mutual surveillance and control. This is mobilization of the masses on a scale only China could envisage. The enemy is nowhere and everywhere, undefinable and invisible. The enemy is within.”

“Special treatment is reserved for those whose relatives are in detention or live abroad. The simple act of pressing their ID card against facial recognition software on entry to any building, housing complex or public area, sounds an alarm which brings four or five armed guards running. An escort to the nearest police station follows, they are questioned aggressively whilst computer checks are run and not released until they are cleared to go free. A simple day trip to the mountains or local beauty spot for these people can result in at worst, detention, and at best being thrown off the public bus they are on and turned away from the resort to find their own way home. Driving through town at night has its own gauntlet of hazards as motor scooters and cars are funneled through rigorous checks of their contents and drivers of their documents and phones,” the report continues.

The report mentioned, “The dawn of each new day heralds yet another layer of security. Whether it be a second layer of razor wire, now the accepted decoration atop every single wall or building in the city, or another configuration of surveillance cameras at the end of your street or housing complex. Many are now reporting cameras at the end of their apartment landings which then broadcast comings and goings on wall to wall screens in the residential area police station. “Every part of our social life is monitored,” said Turnisa, a local primary school teacher. “Friends don’t come any more and I am too scared myself to have visitors in case they bring me trouble.” She added that mistrust has grown exponentially between friends. “How do I know what hold the government has on my friends or how much they are questioned when they leave my home?” She asked. “We all keep ourselves to ourselves these days. We are all afraid.”

The Report also said, “Whether it be a new system of armed guards pacing the roads, new uniforms and weaponry for the elderly bus stop monitors, electrification of school fencing, or increased numbers of armed security at the school gates, people wonder when it will all end. “We cannot imagine what they will think of next,” said Tursun, a shopkeeper who has so far managed to evade capture. “I wake up every morning wondering if this will be my last day of freedom,” he said. “They could pick me up on any pretext at any time.” He spoke of seeing roundups while coming home from the cinema early one evening a few weeks before. “The police were just taking people off the street and driving them into a large van,” he said.

“Selim, a law student, spoke of hearing a commotion outside his window at midnight one evening. “I watched for more than an hour as people piled out of three vans and were herded into the police station. There were men shouting, women screaming and children crying.” He said that family members were running off and returning later to bring clothes and provisions for those who had been taken. He mentioned that one room at the front of the building seemed only to contain children. “They were all just sitting on chairs and tables in the window,” he said.

The above was the report published by Bitter Winter under the caption “County in Xinjiang: A Case Study in Destroying Faith” [https://bitter-winter.org/a-case-study-in-destroying-faith/]

Quoting from another report, Rahima mentioned about children, “A prison officer in Xinjiang said, ‘When dealing with the education of the children of ethnic minorities, the government has organized a rigid and isolated education for them. With public security police officers as their teachers, the young Uyghurs are forced to study a uniform Chinese curriculum arranged by the government — they must speak Chinese, eat pork, wear Han clothes, and live according to the Han people’s habits and tradition. They are restricted to this environment, with no chance to contact the outside world. Indoctrinated with such a heavy-handed and mandatory education, these children of ethnic minorities become unconsciously obedient to the Chinese Communist Party government.””

After quoting two reports, Rahima said, “What we are reading in the papers is only the tip of the iceberg, as there are many more horrendous crimes against humanity taking place at this very moment.”

Naturally the question arises why it is not known to the outside world so long and why did it take so long for the world to take notice of the Chinese party-state’s mass roundup of Uyghur and Kazakh Muslims in Xinjiang? This question was not only raised but answered by Yuan Chan, British-Hong Kong journalist and TV and Radio presenter for many years. He exposed how the ruling party maintains a tight grip on Chinese domestic and overseas media.


Saturday 16 February 2019

The Cordoba Foundation's Campaign for the the Uyghurs

The Cordoba Foundation’s Campaign
for the Uyghurs: A Call to Action

Dr. Mozammel Haque

The Cordoba Foundation organised a conference entitled “China’s Brute Crackdown and Mass Incarceration of Uyghur Muslims” was held at London Muslim Centre, London, on Wednesday, 13th of February, 2019. The conference was inaugurated by Dr Anas Altikriti, the CEO and Founder of The Cordoba Foundation, President of the Muslim Association of Britain, and a leading figure in the Anti-War Movement.

The Cordoba Foundation’s CEO Dr. Anas Altikriti at the very beginning informed the audiences the Cordoba Foundation’s Campaign for the Uyghurs: A Call to Action.
The followings are TCF’s Campaign for the Uyghurs: A Call to Action:


Making presentation to the Government
-          * Briefing the government on the status of the Uyghur and what ought to be done
-          * Demanding that the British government address its Chinese counterpart over this issue
-          * Demanding that the FCO express its condemnation of China’s treatment of the Uyghurs to the China’s Ambassador in London
-          * Lobbying MPs to express their condemnation of China’s oppression of the Uyghurs
-          * Raising questions in Parliament over this issue
-          * Approaching the APPG on China over this issue
-          * Approaching the APPG on Human Rights over this issue
-           
Legal Campaign
-          * Pursue legal avenues to prosecute those perpetrators, illegal detentions and incarceration of Uyghur Muslims

Raising awareness on the Uyghur case
·         Holding conferences across the country addressing the oppression of the Uyghurs
·         * Briefing journalists and bloggerson China’s treatment of the Uyghurs

Direct Support
·         Connecting with the Uyghur community in the UK and across Europe to access direct and second hand testimonies of developments
·         Investigating channels through which aid and support to the Uyghurs can be provided
    



Louise Pyne-Jones on Uyghur Muslims

Louise Pyne-Jones on Uyghur Muslims
IOHR Focuses on What to do
to change the perspectives

Dr. Mozammel Haque

The Cordoba Foundation organised a conference entitled “China’s Brute Crackdown and Mass Incarceration of Uyghur Muslims” was held at London Muslim Centre, London, on Wednesday, 13th of February, 2019. The conference was inaugurated by Dr Anas Altikriti, the CEO and Founder of The Cordoba Foundation, President of the Muslim Association of Britain, and a leading figure in the Anti-War Movement.

The Cordoba Foundation’s CEO Dr. Anas Altikriti invited Louise Pyne-Jones, The Head of Research, of the International Observatory of Human Rights to deliver her speech.. Louise Pyne-Jones’s academic work focuses on religious and colonial ideologies. She is a contributor to The First World War and Its Aftermath, the Shaping of the Middle East.

Louise Pyne-Jones
Louise Pyne-Jones was asked to focus on what to do under the present situation. The Head of Research of The Observatory of Human Rights (IOHR) before starting about the Uyghur Situation in Xinjiang, Pyne-Jones introduced about IOHR. She said, “The work of IOHR is valuable in that we take issues such as the plight of the Uyghurs and bring it to an audience that may not have heard about it.”

She argued, “I think this is important because a number of human rights violations go untouched in the mainstream media, which many rely on as a source of knowledge. At IOHR we are working to create awareness of human rights violations through a multimedia platform that we have developed, that includes a web TV channel, and a mobile app, to create awareness about issues such as this.”


History comes to the present
Like myself who give much importance to history which enables us to take the right course, Pyne-Jones begins going back to the history of the present circumstances of Xinjiang. She said, “As someone who loves history, I am always looking at the connections of the past to the present, and sadly it often seems that mistakes of the past were made but have not been learnt from at all. The current persecution of the Uyghur people is a clear example of how humanity has not learnt from its past. It almost seems as though some governments or authorities want to replicate great tragedies of the past, even down to the techniques used to rid this community of its cultural identity.”

Cultural genocide?
“What is happening to the Uyghurs has been referred to as cultural genocide; I want to take a moment to look a little more clearly at what that means and how we define it. Cultural genocide is considered a component of genocide, and is a strategy used by authorities to destroy cultural heritage.
So, in an age where the Uyghurs, and many other communities across the globe, are facing cultural genocide face wiping out of identities in a time when certain identities seem to be taking over. This is usually done through forced assimilation, dispossession of land and destruction of buildings, artefacts or symbols meaningful to that group or that symbolise an essential part of their cultural heritage. In the case of the Uyghurs many examples have been given about forced assimilation, the destruction of mosques and artefacts.”

“China’s response so far has been to claim that these violations are in the name of ‘clamping down on terrorism’. Chinese media Global Times reports that, ‘the facilities are useful for anti-terrorism and counter-extremism efforts.’ They say that ‘Those held at the training centres had been brainwashed by extremism or committed misdemeanours,’ mentioned by Pyne-Jones and added, “Labelling any group or individual as terrorist gives authorities a premise for repressing freedoms.”

What can we do to change perspectives on this?
Pyne-Jones raised the question: what can we do to change perspectives on this and immediately added, “I do not purport to have the solution for this phenomenon, but I think it does start with dialogue, engagement and knowledge-sharing at the community level, such as at events like this, so we can then debate at a wider international and national level through the media and NGOs such as ours.”

Campaigning and advocating for change
Pyne-Jones mentioned what she was doing at the Observatory of Human Rights (IOHR). She mentioned, “At IOHR we are calling on the Chinese authorities to:

“* Close the internment “Re-Education” camps and immediately release all those held in arbitrary detention.
“* Reveal the names, whereabouts and current status of all those who have been subjected to enforced disappearance in China.
“* Cease policies of forced cultural assimilation and social re-engineering, known as “Cultural Genocide”, focused on the Uyghurs, Tibetans, Southern Mongolians and other groups.
“* Allow access for independent investigators to visit and monitor the region.”

Pyne-Jones, the Head of Research of IOHR also mentioned, “We are currently working with MPs to raise these issues in parliament and ensure they are subsequently addressed by the Chinese authorities. We would like to invite you to join us in our call to stop the indiscriminate human rights violations carried out by China on the Uyghur people.”






China's Persecution of Uyghur Muslims Must Stop - Emily Thornberry MP

China’s Persecution of Uyghur  Muslims
 Must Stop, says Emily Thornberry MP

Dr. Mozammel Haque

“We will not stand silent while the Uighur community remain subject to this terrible repression and persecution, all done to them for no other reason than their Muslim faith..” said Rt. Hon. Emily Thornberry MP for Islington South and Finsbury and Shadow Secretary o State or Commonwealth and Foreign Affairs at the event ‘China’s Brute Crackdown and Incarceration of Uyghur Muslims’ organised by Cordoba Foundation, on Wednesday 13 February, 2019.

Abhorrent prejudice based on religion
Labour MP Thornberry described the situation in Xinjiang. She said, “what we see in China today: hundreds of thousands in mass detention; hundreds of thousands facing cultural re-education and psychological indoctrination; a whole people facing systematic oppression and brutal violence… …Is something we associate with Cambodia forty years ago…or China fifty years ago or in other countries down the decades and centuries where abhorrent prejudice based on religion, race or skin colour - has been allowed to flourish unchallenged.”

“To send the simple message but one that must be shouted loud and clear throughout our country and the world, and one that must be heard by China… That and it cannot be tolerated any longer. And one of the reasons we need to raise awareness of this issue now, and make clear it cannot continue, is that - as we all deaths and even organ harvesting have emerged from the camps,” said Rt. Hon. Thornberry.
.

That is not just abhorrent, it is unacceptable,
and it cannot be tolerated any longer.
Labour MP Thornberry said, “But for that to be happening today, two decades into the twenty-first century, in a country with a permanent seat on the Security Council - that is not just abhorrent, it is unacceptable, and it cannot be tolerated any longer. And one of the reasons we need to raise awareness of this issue now, and make clear it cannot continue, is that - as we all know -- it has been getting worse for the past 5 years, and it is getting worse as we speak, driven by State Secretary Chen.”

Rt. Hon. Thornberry said, “The number of Uyghur currently being detained in re-education centres is at least 1 million, detained for reasons as straightforward as regularly attending mosque. Increasing reports of torture, abuse, deaths and even organ harvesting have emerged from the camps.”

What can be done? Public condemnation, Shut
Down camps and use pressure on the Chinese
So what can be done? asked the Labour MP Thornberry. She said there must be public condemnation, shut down the camps, and or the UK government to use pressure on the Chinese government and prevent deportation of Uyghur asylum seekers back to China. She said, “Clearly, it is important that we maintain public condemnation of the treatment of the Uighurs, and support the call of the UN for the Chinese authorities to shut down the re-education camps now. We also need the UK Government to continue to use intergovernmental forums to apply pressure on the Chinese. Here in the UK, it is imperative we prevent the deportation of Uyghur asylum seekers back to China and expedite asylum applications from Uighur Muslims.”


Impose sanctions against the individuals
who are abusing human rights
“And one option that the Government did not have a year ago is to use the ‘Magnitsky powers’ that Labour ensured were passed into law this year to impose sanctions against the individuals who are abusing human rights. And first in line should be State Secretary Chen.”

Consider implementing export controls
on surveillance technology
Speaking about the role of private sector, Shadow Secretary of State for Commonwealth and Foreign Affairs, Rt Hon. Thornberry said, “The private sector also has a role to play. We must urge any companies operating in Xinjiang province to end any business operations that are contributing to human rights abuses. And the British Government must also consider implementing export controls on surveillance technology that is used by the provincial authorities to monitor and oppress Uyghur Muslims.”

We need to act fast.
“But whatever we do, we need to act fast. China may be an important trading partner, and a vital player in the world, but that is all the more reason to demand that they act on human rights abuses, not for us to turn a blind eye to the glaringly obvious. And frankly, what is happening is glaringly obvious. What was claimed to be an attempt to target extremism and terrorism has morphed into something horrendously different, where the only thing being targeted is those who practice the Muslim faith,” said Rt. Hon. Thornberry.

Now is the time for us to say ‘enough is enough’,
now is the time to tell China this must stop
Mentioning the only thing being targeted is those who practice the Muslim faith, Shadow Secretary of State for Commonwealth and Foreign Affairs, Thornberry said, “In other words, it is the old-age story of ‘us’ and ‘them’, the ‘normal’ and the ‘other’, and as soon as people start to think in that way, and as soon as the state starts to act in that way, and divide people in that way, we are on a very slippery and dangerous slope. And we already a long way day that slope in China. So now is the time for us to say ‘enough is enough’, now is the time to tell China this must stop, and now is the time to ensure the Uighur people can practice their faith in peace. Because there is no ‘them’, there is no ‘other’, there is only ‘us’.”




Tuesday 12 February 2019

Lord Ahmed Asks Questions on Uyghur Muslims in China at the House of Lords' Chamber

Lord Ahmed Asks Questions on Uyghur Muslims
in China at the House of Lords’ Chamber

Dr. Mozammel Haque

I am fortunate enough on Monday, the 11th of February 2019 that I attended the Lords’ Chamber as guest of Lord Nazir Ahmed of Rotherham and listened to the debates, Lord Ahmed asked the question on Uyghur Muslims Community in China. Followings are the question and reply on Uyghur Muslims in China at the House of Lords chamber on 11 February, 2019.

Human Rights Abuses Against the
Uyghur Muslim Community in China
Lord Ahmed (Non-Afl) asked Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the allegations of human rights abuses committed against the Uighur Muslim community in the Western Province of China.

The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon) (Conservative Party) replied, “My Lords, we remain seriously concerned about the human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the use of political re-education camps and widespread surveillance and restrictions targeted at Uighur Muslims and indeed other minority groups. Our diplomats recently visited Xinjiang. We believe strongly that everyone everywhere should enjoy equal rights and protections under the law. That is why we are promoting and defending human rights, including the right to freedom of religion or belief, which is a fundamental part of the UK’s foreign policy.”

Closure of these concentration camps
And access for UN representatives
Lord Ahmed (Non-Afl) said, “I thank the Minister for his reply. As he has already confirmed, according to media and social media reports, concentration camps, mass surveillance, forced disappearances, torture and the banning of religious practices are all happening there. Will the Minister join me in condemning these gross violations of human rights by the Chinese authorities, and will he demand the closure of these concentration camps and access for UN representatives to confirm that the detainees have been released and the camps have been closed down?”
We are working on this, including with
the UN – replied Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied: “The noble Lord rightly raises important issues and concerns. Reports have also indicated that even basic expressions of religious symbolism, such as the growing of a beard or the wearing of a headscarf, are used as indicators to target particular communities. I assure the noble Lord that we are working on this, including with the UN, which he mentioned. We have clearly asked the Chinese authorities to implement the full recommendations of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, and we have reminded them both bilaterally—as the Foreign Secretary did last year in his meeting with the Chinese Foreign Minister—and in the Human Rights Council that our concerns about the camps and the reports from our diplomats in Beijing require action. On human rights more generally, I assure the noble Lord that I am specifically looking at the next meeting of the Human Rights Council in March to see how we can not just lobby on this issue but build stronger alliances.

Have we warned the International Criminal Court
to keep an eye on what is happening in some of these camps?
Then Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrats) joined in this debate and said: “My Lords, the noble Lord is right to raise his concerns about the abuse of human rights of the Uighur community in Xinjiang province. Today, Turkey has made a formal protest to the United Nations, asking it to investigate what is going on in that part of the world. Have we made formal representations to the United Nations, and have we warned the International Criminal Court to keep an eye on what is happening in some of these camps?”

Minister assures to raise these issues bilaterally with
China and through building international alliances
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied to the above question: “My Lords, as I said, the United Kingdom has taken a very serious stance on this issue. I mentioned the Human Rights Council. At the latest UPR last November, we raised not the general issue of human rights but specifically the plight of the Uighurs and the detention camps. I assure the noble Lord that we will consider all avenues at our disposal to raise these issues bilaterally with China and through building international alliances. It is because of the strength of our relationship with China, which is an important one, that we can raise these issues in a candid manner.”

Reports came that Uyghur Muslims were
forced to give DNA tissue and blood
Baroness Berridge (Conservative) joined in this debate and said, “My Lords, there have been consistent reports from within these re-education camps that Uighur Muslims were forced to give DNA tissue and blood, and consistent allegations that Falun Gong followers have been subject to forced organ harvesting. Have we spoken to the Chinese about our worries about those tests and their purpose, and whether they are in any way connected to the recent worrying reports of rogue gene editing in China?”

China’s actions are disproportionate, discriminatory
Against particular community, said the Minister
 Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied: “My noble friend makes some important points. On organ harvesting, I am fully cognisant of the issue of Falun Gong, which I know the noble Lord, Lord Alton, has raised several times. As my noble friend may be aware, Sir Geoffrey Nice conducted a report on this matter, the preliminary findings of which have been made available; the final report is still due. Foreign Office officials attended the launch of the preliminary report and will attend the follow-up meeting. On the other issues she raises, let me assure her that in all our interactions with the Chinese Administration, we have made it very clear that their actions are disproportionate, discriminatory against particular communities and, indeed, counterproductive in the longer term for China as it seeks to establish its position on the world stage. I assure my noble friend that we will continue to raise these issues through all avenues.”

Raise with China the danger to its whole belt
If many countries follow Turkey’s lead
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Cross Benches) joined in the debate and said, “My Lords, in the aftermath of the death in detention of the Uighur poet and musician, Abdurehim Heyit, how does the Minister respond to the Turkish Foreign Ministry—referred to by the noble Lord, Lord Dholakia—calling on China to close the camps, alleging, in its words, “torture and brainwashing” and calling them “a shame on humanity”? Can we expect to see the United Kingdom Government not only press again the human rights point with the Security Council but raise with China the danger to its whole belt and road initiative, which is in jeopardy if many countries with large Muslim populations decide to follow Turkey’s lead and start imposing sanctions, preventing the development of those capital projects?”

The camps are extrajudicial and are held so that
people can change their faith, the Minister said
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied: “Like the noble Lord, Lord Dholakia, the noble Lord raises the issue of Turkey and other countries. I assure them that we are working with all international partners on this important priority. I agree with the noble Lord about the camps. First, China claimed that they did not exist. Now the claim is that they are there for re-education. About 10% of the whole Uighur community is being held in these camps. It is clear that the camps are extrajudicial and are held so that people can change their faith. We are aware of the various reports and we will act to ensure that they are verifiable. That does not mean that we are sitting back and doing nothing; we are working with all like-minded partners. As I said in response to the noble Lord, Lord Ahmed, I shall seek to take this up during Human Rights Council meetings as well.”

Consider to make representations about
human rights of children currently caged?
Baroness Kingsmill (Labour Party) joined in this debate and said, “My Lords, will the Government consider making representations to the Trump Administration in respect of the human rights of the hundreds, possibly thousands, of children currently caged, it would appear, many of whom have been lost in the system? There is a real breach there. They are our allies. It would be helpful if representations were being made.”

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied: “My Lords, the noble Baroness raises a number of issues, including the allegations of children being caged. All these matters are very much on our radar. Specifically on the American question, I am in regular contact with Sam Brownback, the US ambassador for freedom of religious belief. I hope to meet him very soon and I assure the noble Baroness that we will discuss this issue.”

Try to build up a much stronger response
So that China does listen
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour Party) joined in the debate and said; “My Lords, there are pictures of these camps on the BBC website. They are huge and the idea that they are somehow for educational purposes is just crazy. Can the noble Lord tell us more about building alliances, because the international response to this crisis has been muted? What is he doing, specifically with other Muslim countries, to try to build up a much stronger response so that China does listen?”

I shall seek to take this up during Human Rights
Council meeting in March  – The Minister said
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon replied: “I too have seen those images and anyone who has cannot help but be appalled by them. The noble Lord raises the issue of building alliances. I have talked about the Human Rights Council and my meeting with the US ambassador for freedom of religious belief. However, this is not just about Muslim countries. As I often say, I defend the rights of Christians and people of no belief, not despite being a Muslim but because I am a Muslim—as anyone of any faith would protect the rights of others. That is the British Government’s approach, which I know is shared by the noble Lord and, indeed, across the House. That is how we will approach this issue.”


Sunday 10 February 2019

Is There Any Change or Omission in The Qur'an

Is there any change or omission in the Qur’an?

Dr. Mozammel Haque

Generally people are curious and pose the question: is there any change or omission or addition in the Qur’an? I think this question must be answered in order to resolve any confusion. I think, it should be clearly said without any ambiguity that there is no changes, no additions, no omissions and no alterations in the text of the Qur’an after the Prophet peace be upon him passed away. It is also to be mentioned that once the Qur’an is collected and compiled as a text by the Third Caliph Uthman bin Affan there is no changes or nothing is omitted from the Qur’an. 

Now, at the Islamic Cultural Centre, London, someone raised this question at the Islamic Circle meeting on 5th of January 2019. The Question was: Some part of the Qur’an is added or omitted or dropped from the Qur’an? That was the question. Whether this is true or not that is the question.

Dr. Ahmad al-Dubayan
Director General of the Centre
Dr. Ahmad al-Dubayan, Director General of the Islamic Cultural Centre, London, gave a lecture on this issue. He has already talked about the abrogation in the Qur’an or not. He said, “The Qur’an that we have now as a Book is it the real Qur’an that was revealed to Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam or there is some part of it is missing or may be, some part of it is added which is not a part of the Qur’an? This is a question.”

Dr. al-Dubayan said, “Be careful I am going to explain this. Those who believe, from the Sunnah specially, that there is abrogation in the Qur’an; they said there were some verses, may be, two or three or four verses of the Qur’an revealed to the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam during his life and then during his life these were removed from the Qur’an. So revealed to be there and revealed to be removed. The Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam was there.”

“When the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam came to the end of his life, the Qur’an was known as a text; but not all the companions memorized the Qur’an; each one memorized some parts of them; some of them may be two-thirds of the Qur’an; some of them almost all; some of them one Juz’ or two Juz’; three Juz’; but the community, all of them, memorized the Qur’an all together; few only who can memorize the Qur’an completely. Few people only; but most of them memorized some parts,” explained Dr. al-Dubayan.

First Caliph Abu Bakr created a committee
The ICC Director General continued, “About one year, even less than one year after the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam dead, Abu Bakr Siddiq,the First Caliph, himself started to write down the Qur’an, the text. He created a committee. This committee in Madinah used to go to each one in Madinah to ask: ‘Do you memorize anything from the Qur’an? Yes, what do you memorize? I memorize this.’ Then they wrote down what he memorized and then they matched it with others and where is this? Is it this part or this chapter till they complete their work all of it.”

“Abu Bakr wrote this and kept it in his house. After his death, of course, Omar bin Khattab, the second Caliph, took it with him and then Omar bin Khattab all his life about ten years (This subject - Omar bin Khattab and the Qur’an - was talked about before) and then Omar bin Khattab was killed. Then this collection of the Qur’an was given to his daughter Hafsa, who is the wife of the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam. After two three years, the Third Caliph, Uthman bin Affan, started the process of writing the Qur’an again. He asked Hafsa to hand over these things that she had. Then Hafsa gave it to them,” Dr. al-Dubayan mentioned.  

The Third Caliph Uthman bin Affan
Created committee and wrote the Qur’an text
The ICC chief continued, “Then Uthman bin Affan again created a committee. The committee also did the same. They went to ask everybody; they checked whatever Abu Bakr wrote before, about 12 years ago; and then they wrote it again. Uthman bin Affan created a committee of companions to read it and to write it; to agree for a certain order as I said to you the Chapters; not the verses; we know from the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam. They wrote it down. In order to avoid any problem, Uthman bin Affan wrote five copies, some historians said, seven copies, some of them said, even about ten copies. He sent one to the major cities; he sent one to Kufa in Iraq; one to Basra; one to Damascus in Syria. They said he sent one to Yemen; and then he kept one in Madinah. Some people said, he sent another one to Makkah. Then the Third Caliph asked the Governor of the cities to ask people when they wanted to have a Qur’an they copied from this copy; that’s why; we have now one Qur’an.”

Companion Hudhaifah bin Al-Yaman
asked to do it immediately
Dr. al-Dubayan then enquired how this idea of having one Qur’an came. He described and narrated the events for having to do this. He said, “That was the idea of another Companion who is Hudhaifah bin Al-Yaman. Hudhaifah bin Al-Yaman was actually in Armenia that time. Can you imagine the companions of the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam reached Armenia? He was in Armenia with Muslim army there. Then some one recited the verse of the Qur’an; some body said no, no, this is not like this; it is recited that way. Then the other person said; no, this is not correct; this is the way how it was recited.”

“Then Hudhaifah bin Al-Yaman himself, who was the companion of the Prophet, realised that there is something really very dangerous. He moved from Armenia back long way to Madinah; met Uthman bin Affan and said to him: ‘You have to do something urgently before we have the same problem that the Jews and Christians have with the Bible. There are different versions.  Immediately you have to write down.’ Then Uthman bin Affan did it,” Dr. al-Dubayan mentioned the background.

Shia-Sunni story – a political issue,
not religious one
That was the background of having one Qur’an which was written down as one Qur’an after having committees during Abu Bakr, Omar bin al-Khattab and Uthman bin Affan. This is how the present Qur’an compiled as one text, one Book. Now, Dr. al-Dubayan mentioned about the opinion of the Shia and the Shia-Sunni story. He said, “Some Shia, not all Shia; by the way, said that the Qur’an is being changed; why? “There is a long explanation which I am trying to squeeze for you in a short time. You know the story of Shia and Sunni started in the beginning; it was a political issue, not religious issue. Those only dispute between Ali ibn Abi Talib RA because of the Uthman bin Affan the third Caliph was killed; then each one had different idea anyway that led to some fighting; then that was some political.”

“After that those who supported Ali tried to find, say after about, may be, eighty years after, the idea was created that Ali bin Abi Talib is the real and the first Caliph and the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam had a will for Ali. The Will, okay, was removed and then they gave it to Abu Bakr Siddiq. This is something like conspiracy done by the companions. This opinion was created, may be, one century after the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam. Not within a first century. Nobody talked about it,” Dr. al-Dubayan mentioned.

The ICC Chief went into different topic for discussion. He said, “Now the question is: If Allah SWT wanted Ali to be the first Caliph, how come then HE allows His plan to be changed. Question? We know the biography of Abu Bakr; we know the biography of Omar bin al-Khattab; we know the biography of Uthman bin Affan. They are good people. How come suddenly in the last minute of the life of the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam they become evil and they changed the will. A good Question? Another thing that is: those who believe in what we call it Immamah or Imanship of Ali; they said Imamship of Ali is something like pillar of Islam. It means, not to be a Muslim till you do not believe in this, according to them; not according to us. From this issue, there is a big question. Okay, if imamship of Ali is so important like Hajj, like Zakat, why it is not mentioned in the Qur’an; where is it? Show us in the Qur’an; where is it? Not there. It is not possible Allah says us something so important; then HE does not mentioned in the Qur’an.”

No additions, No Omissions in the Qur’an
Dr. al-Dubayan then entered into a more difficult question, saying there were two versions of those who believed there are changes in the Qur’an – one believed after the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam and another believed during the lifetime of the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam. Dr. al-Dubayan first dealt with those who believed changes took place after the Prophet. He argued, “Most of them came to the idea that the Qur’an has been changed. Good Question. How the Qur’an is changed? They said after the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam, some people just removed the whole Qur’an like this and then they removed all these verses talking about Ali and they removed them and those who cursed Omar removed them; those cursed Uthman they removed them; Abu Bakr removed them. To make them good people. Remove the verses talking about Imammat of Ali ibn Abi Talib to make it so that the people do not know about it. And they said this is the Qur’an.”

“They have a problem about this. Now, those who believed there is a change after the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam that is the problem. That means the Qur’an is not protected. Allah SWT says in the Qur’an We have revealed the Qur’an and We are going to preserve it. Preservation of the Qur’an is that you cannot change it. And till today with all these millions of manuscripts found everywhere in the world you find it always the same text. I think no additions, nothing omitted,” Dr. al-Dubayan clarified the position.

Qur’anic Manuscripts in the Birmingham University
Then Dr. al-Dubayan mentioned about the manuscripts in the Birmingham University. He said, “Recently manuscripts of three or four pages of the Qur’an found in the University of Birmingham; the oldest Qur’an actually. It is one of the oldest manuscripts actually discovered in the Birmingham University. It was actually kept there since about 1920, but nobody paid that much attention to. By chance, one of the researchers came and then found this. Even that one, I checked it myself; it is exactly the same text that is you have in the printed Qur’an. No; not even one single word added; not one single word omitted.”

“The great scholars, the Orientalist, who are not Muslims, who studied the Qur’an, they said it is not possible to find another. There is no other. Even recently, not all Shia, by the way, they follow this opinion. That is the Qur’an. Some of them, not all. Some of them start to change, said: All these Hadiths or references saying that Qur’an has been changed; it is not correct; they are weak. They are not accepted; but still there are references. Okay; some Shia believe exactly like us that the Qur’an is as it is; that’s it,” that was about the Shia, said Dr. Al-Dubayan.

One Text One Qur’an in the whole World
Now talking about the Sunni community Dr. al-Dubayan said, “All of them say that the Qur’an is preserved and these are the Qur’an as it is revealed to the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam and as it was written by Uthman bin Affan. The copies of the Uthman bin Affan, by the way, are till recently, may be hundred years or 400 years, they are still existing. Yes. One copy of it was in Baghdad and then carried to Cairo years ago and from Cairo we assume it is now in Istanbul; there is another one attributed to Ali ibn Abi Talib it is in Sanaa, Yemen; and there is another one in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. It is believed this is the copy of Uthman bin Affan and there was one also in Andalusia in Spain. Actually when Muslims left Spain somebody carried that copy in a ship that ship sunk in the Mediterranean and the copy lost forever.”

Ibn Battuta mentioned Qur’an by Uthman
Bin Affan in Damascus in 12th century
“Some historians talked about the copy in Madinah. They said, it is there; but where it is now we don’t know. Ibn Battuta when he entered Damascus in the 12th century he mentioned in Damascus, every Friday they used to bring out the Qur’an by Uthman bin Affan; people see it; where it is now? We don’t find. Anyway, we want to say Alhamdolillah, finally, we have only one text; one Qur’an. If you see another copy of the Qur’an another version of the Qur’an in the world you will find the same without any changes,” Dr. Al-Dubayan said finally there is only one text One Qur’an.

Dr. al-Dubayan again repeated how the Qur’an was collected and how the Surah and Chapters were arranged. He said, “The Qur’an was written during the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam but it was not collected as one collection. That happened during the days of Abu Bakr when he started this. During the days of Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam people used to memorise than to write. When something revealed, for example, Surah al-Fateha, when they heard the Prophet read in the mosque, when they heard, most of people memorised. The Arabs, by the way, are very good in their memory; memorised even thousands of poetry; so they memorised quickly and because of this, there is also interest of their religion. They have the strong desire to memorise it.”

Difference between collection and collected
“Not all the companions memorised the Qur’an but all of them, all together as a community memorised it all. But it was scattered among them all. That’s why, during the days of Abu Bakr the companions of the committees started to collect them all because there would be no other revelations; because the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam was dead already. During the days of the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam it was not collected; because the revelation was continuing; was coming. During the time of Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam, he instructed: first put this Surah in that place; there must be match, where it should be put it; but it was not collected,” mentioned Dr. al-Dubayan.

Ibn Mas’ud’s Qur’an
After explaining the difference between collection and other collected, Dr. al-Dubayan clarified about Ibn Mas’ud’s Qur’an. He said, “Ibn Mas’ud had the same Qur’an but Ibn Mas’ud had the order of the chapters; that’s one, okay. Even Mas’ud did not include Surah Qul Falaq and Qul Nas; he did not know it is part of the Qur’an. So he did not write in his Qur’an. And he had the different order of the Surah; not the verses. Surah only. May be, he has the Surah Falaq in the beginning; or Baqara in the middle. When the third Caliph Uthman ibn Affan  standised the Qur’an; he said: ‘I do not want another Qur’an.’

“When Ali ibn Abi Talib was asked during his time about this, he said: “That is excellent, if he has not done it; I would do it today.’ That is what Ali said. The work of Abdullah ibn Mas’ud is the work of one man, while the work of Uthman ibn Affan is a work of the whole committee including himself, including Ali ibn Abi Talib, including Zayed ibn Thabit. They participated and they were also members of the previous committee. So it is a group of people, not one,” clarified Dr. Al-Dubayan.

Surah Al-Falaq and Surah Al-Nas were revealed during the last days of the Prophet Sallallahu wa Sallam. That time ibn Mas’ud did not think these are verses of the Qur’an. When they told him, confusion gone and he accepted.